My Dearest Friend Ducksie - R I P
ChatterBank1 min ago
good on him.. maddie suspect
Answers
1 to 14 of 14
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by gina32. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Fair play to you, gina, you're consistent.
My mate's dog has got this rubber toy. You throw it and the dog catches it in its mouth. It bites down hard on it and won't let go, thrashing it around while you wait for it to get bored. The thing is, it never does. The toy doesn't squeak or move or do anything. But the dog is fixated with it. It never ever gets bored of it.
Dunno why I just thought of that.
My mate's dog has got this rubber toy. You throw it and the dog catches it in its mouth. It bites down hard on it and won't let go, thrashing it around while you wait for it to get bored. The thing is, it never does. The toy doesn't squeak or move or do anything. But the dog is fixated with it. It never ever gets bored of it.
Dunno why I just thought of that.
-- answer removed --
Okay, okay, I'll contribute something.
I never actually followed the Maddy case, I just remember the flurry of activity on AB when this guy came under question. I do remember thinking at the time that the treatment he was getting was distasteful, but thought a little suspicion was justified.
However, he has clearly been decided as innocent (or perhaps just too little evidence) by the police and as such does deserve the compensation he's receiving. Though it does seem a little much - but it always does.
I never actually followed the Maddy case, I just remember the flurry of activity on AB when this guy came under question. I do remember thinking at the time that the treatment he was getting was distasteful, but thought a little suspicion was justified.
However, he has clearly been decided as innocent (or perhaps just too little evidence) by the police and as such does deserve the compensation he's receiving. Though it does seem a little much - but it always does.
Murat is guilty, as simple as that. It is just there is no concrete proof.
Yes I have the greatest criminal mind since the fictional Sherlock Holmes, but when reorting to basic observational skills, you don't need to be supre sleuth to realise the facts.
1) He smokes
2) He has a gammy eye
3) He lives with his mother
4) He has a je ne sais quoi smile.
Guilty as Blackadder would say, as a puppy sitting next to a fresh pile of poo.
Hang him high.
Yes I have the greatest criminal mind since the fictional Sherlock Holmes, but when reorting to basic observational skills, you don't need to be supre sleuth to realise the facts.
1) He smokes
2) He has a gammy eye
3) He lives with his mother
4) He has a je ne sais quoi smile.
Guilty as Blackadder would say, as a puppy sitting next to a fresh pile of poo.
Hang him high.
collectively the so called papers are paying him �500,000, that is nothing compared to the sales they made running the stories.
the papers weigh up what a court case, costs , fines , damages etc could cost against likely sales.
I used to work for the mirror group, they dont have 24h lawyers on site for nothing.
youd be amazed at how many stories go through the llegal boys and girls before going to press.
they got off lightly in this case, money well spent from their point of view
the papers weigh up what a court case, costs , fines , damages etc could cost against likely sales.
I used to work for the mirror group, they dont have 24h lawyers on site for nothing.
youd be amazed at how many stories go through the llegal boys and girls before going to press.
they got off lightly in this case, money well spent from their point of view
1 to 14 of 14
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.