Donate SIGN UP

This blunder cost the NHS dearly.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 11:07 Wed 24th Feb 2010 | News
5 Answers
http://www.express.co...s-we-will-never-need-

While I agree we should have had the initial stocks of vaccine, just in case, But shouldn't the bureaucrats have put a cancel clause into the contract?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Not as dearly as if it had turned out to be more dangerous and there had been insufficient stocks.

Would you consider it a blunder to insure your house when you didn't have to claim ?
Damned if they do,Damned if they don't !
Question Author
That's not what is under discussion.

If they had initially arranged a cancel clause into the contract, then having found they did not need the whole order, they could have put a stop to the order.

/// In recent weeks, Germany has successfully negotiated a cut in its order for swine flu jabs by 30 per cent. Other countries are still negotiating.///
///If they had initially arranged a cancel clause into the contract, then having found they did not need the whole order, they could have put a stop to the order.

/// In recent weeks, Germany has successfully negotiated a cut in its order for swine flu jabs by 30 per cent. Other countries are still negotiating./// ////

If Germany had a cancellation clause, then they wouldn't need to //negotiate/// they would simply cancel. Same as the other countries.

I have no doubt that this government will be negotiating as well.

Edit - more details here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8448080.stm

There is indeed a cancel clause in one of the contracts (albeit the smaller one) and there is potential to sell this on to other countries (or indeed keep it for the next few years)

Yes, with hindsight, a cancel clause would have been ideal - but in times of potential national emergency, decisions that are wrong will often be made - lets hope that we can learn from them.
just because they might have wanted a cancel clause doesn't mean they would have got one, at least not at the same price. The manufacturers wouldn't necessarily have signed a deal that provided for the other side to pull out for free if they felt like it (would you?).

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

This blunder cost the NHS dearly.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.