As I see it, the UN is at a crossroads here. Does it wish to become the world's police force or not. If Iraq complies with all the resolutions and disarms,leaving its defences seriously depleted, theoretically the UN has a moral obligation to step in if another nation subsequently attacks Iraq. This would then set a precedent and one would expect the UN to become more pro-active in peacekeeping/peacemaking. I'm not saying this is the right way to go, just trying to give a possible chain of events. I just couldn't see the disparate nations of the UN ever agreeing on which situations would require intervention.I'm afraid political & strategic considerations would always outweigh the moral question. So to (finally) answer your question perhaps he should give up the weapons but demand a UN presence on the border.