Donate SIGN UP

You Doubted The Attrocities.....

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 11:46 Mon 06th Nov 2023 | News
205 Answers

https://news.sky.com/story/israel-hamas-war-mutilated-charred-remains-bear-witness-to-the-extreme-barbarity-of-militant-attack-13001153

I assume you'll dismiss this from sky but there were beheaded children: "From a beheaded child to a man who was shot, stabbed, burned and then run over, a dedicated forensics team is confronted with the horrendous, stomach-churning injuries inflicted by the insurgents, as they work to identify the Israeli dead and bring closure to their families."

Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 205rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Avatar Image
I have seen posts on here which border on apologists for Hamas, and which make me sick to my stomach- one user even called them "freedom fighters."  Perhaps those who hold these murderers and terrorists in such high regard would do well to take a look at themselves. 
14:08 Mon 06th Nov 2023

Thanks again Atheist.  

Naomi, so you think it's OK  to name four people over and over again as Hamas supporters and accuse them of approving Hamas methods of killing and torture?  I give up.  

Indeed RH. The site slips further into the mire. 

Anyone who is unhappy with any post here is free to use the report button.

Redhelen, apart from named mods, you have no idea which of the others may be contributing to any thread - or which of them is saying what.  

Asking the same thing over and over again, is there not a medical condition for that ? 
Some ttt have no wish to respond to your posts.

 Countrylover, no, I don't think that's alright - and when the accusation was aimed at you I defended you. 

 

Naomi - if you (a MOD) is partaking in a thread that is breaking rules then you have a responsibility to remove that posts and if it continues the user.

You have stated that you don't think TTT is breaking the rules even though it has been pointed out several times that it is breaking the rules.

I am sure if I or someone else broke the rules the way that TTT does frequently you would remove us quicker than you would remove your fur coat!

TTT's list af alleged 'apologists' contained several names, not just...

The original post was worded so as to appear aimed at ABers, not non AB 'nutters' who go on marches etc.

He did not ask any question, he simply sought to provoke upset and anger. We don't need that sort of attitude at this dangerous time.

 

We can see you're involved though. Can you clement on why moderation isn't being used in accordance with Site Rules, particularly where Tora names Sandy and provides a link?

The language used in the OP is not in accordance with the Site Rules I and others are quoting. With that in mind, could you comment why the post is allowed to continue?

oh and BTW, I have reported it. 

Above to Naomi

comment not clement

its allowed to remain because she is biased

Redhelen, I am not obliged to remove anything.  Atheist kindly defined the word 'Apologist' as //a person who supports a particular belief or political system, especially an unpopular one, and speaks or writes in defence of it//

 

Some people here do that.

see biased

//BTW, I have reported it. //

 

Good.  That's exactly what you should do if you're unhappy.

Redhelen, do you mean I'm biased?  How so?

Naomi, I have no objection to the word 'apologist' on its own, but 'Hamas apologist' I do object to.

biased - unfairly prejudiced for or against someone or something.

12.17  naomi he has accused me again on this thread.  He was warned in a pleasant way yesterday by another mod.  He has used 4 names time and time again and you say nothing.  I don't need defending  I need to see fairness on this site and fair moderation.  I used to respect you as a mod.  

It's not a pleasant term though is it, Naomi. It is a derogatory term used to deliberately stir things up. 
 

You've done some stupendously silly things on here in the past but trying to defend a deliberately  provocative post which is clearly against Site Rules just further denigrates your standing on here. 

Atheist, difficult when Hamas are the aggressors.  I don't see anyone else involved in this battle.

What your doing here, Naomi, is letting your personal opinions and feelings about the Palestine / Hamas situation prejudice your Moderator position. That is an appalling way to behave. 

21 to 40 of 205rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

You Doubted The Attrocities.....

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.