Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
The Mary Whitehouse Effect
35 Answers
Answers
'It may cause offence because children will be walking past' For goodness sake the most a child would do is say 'mummy why has that lady go no clothes on?' I'm more offended by the grossly obese women that waddle along the high street in leggings. As for the other two adverts, -I can imagine the 'women' that complained about those....... Madness.
13:10 Wed 28th Oct 2020
'It may cause offence because children will be walking past' For goodness sake the most a child would do is say 'mummy why has that lady go no clothes on?'
I'm more offended by the grossly obese women that waddle along the high street in leggings.
As for the other two adverts, -I can imagine the 'women' that complained about those.......
Madness.
I'm more offended by the grossly obese women that waddle along the high street in leggings.
As for the other two adverts, -I can imagine the 'women' that complained about those.......
Madness.
/// 'mummy why has that lady got no clothes on?' ///
a question only to be asked by people who shower while fully clad, I would have thought. I would have thought it was unrevealing and unerotic. Mamya has a point about it being next to a crossing, but that's surfely not within the remit of the Advertising Standards Authority.
And I'd say the same if it was an obese woman in leggings: no point in denouncing skin-shaming and then introducing fat-shaming.
a question only to be asked by people who shower while fully clad, I would have thought. I would have thought it was unrevealing and unerotic. Mamya has a point about it being next to a crossing, but that's surfely not within the remit of the Advertising Standards Authority.
And I'd say the same if it was an obese woman in leggings: no point in denouncing skin-shaming and then introducing fat-shaming.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.