Donate SIGN UP

Sally Challen

Avatar Image
Tilly2 | 17:49 Sun 07th Apr 2019 | News
212 Answers
You may remember me posting this link wishing this woman well.

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1648041.html

She has had the conviction for murder quashed and is now back home.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-47845450

She will now face a new trial and again, I hope that things turn out positively for her.
Gravatar

Answers

181 to 200 of 212rss feed

First Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Avatar Image
I have had the benefit of reading the judgements in the original appeal against sentence and the latest one against conviction. I am in two minds about this. They had separated and she had moved out; however, they had reconciled and they had spent the afternoon together at the former matrimonial home. That afternoon, she became suspicious that he was...
11:06 Mon 08th Apr 2019
agchristie, the deceased's sons have been campaigning for her release.

You can read about the case here
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/29/devoted-wife-who-killed-husband-with-hammer-sally-challen
I keep reading this OP as "Salty Chicken"
Calicogirl

/// (She claims that, for the rest of her life, she hated to confront him in case he did it again.) ///

Well she definitely made sure he didn't by smashing his head in with a hammer.
In her murderous mind, job done.
Lots of couples suffer abuse, torment, affairs etc. Divorce & separation is the remedy & NOT killing each other. A dangerous precedent is set if killing/murder is unpunished.
I have had the benefit of reading the judgements in the original appeal against sentence and the latest one against conviction. I am in two minds about this.

They had separated and she had moved out; however, they had reconciled and they had spent the afternoon together at the former matrimonial home. That afternoon, she became suspicious that he was continuing his infidelity and there was a minor row. They had been cleaning out the garage and she had put a hammer in her handbag. Later after she got him something to eat she killed him. She went home, but the next day ended up at Beachy Head where she was talked down and arrested.

There is very little in either judgement about the extent or the effect of the alleged abuse she suffered; indeed, this was one of the reasons for the appeal. Thus on the one hand, it appears that she murdered him in a jealous rage; however, the Court of Appeal were persuaded that evidence of the coercive and controlling nature of her husband ought to be before the jury. At present, we simply do not know what evidence her defence team will be adducing.

If it was the case that she was subject to long-term abuse then I do have immense sympathy for her but I cannot help questioning why Counsel at her original trial did not lead such evidence. There have certainly been previous cases where women have killed physically abusive partners and have been convicted of manslaughter as opposed to murder. I imagine the difference with this is that this was emotional abuse (this is the controlling and coercive behaviour). To what extent, remains to be seen.

naomi

/// On the other hand, is it understandable that after years of abuse she finally snapped? ///

Why did she continuously put up with that kind of abuse for all those years, she could have simply walked out on him, years ago, as many other women and men choose to do.

It is not Victorian days, when women were completely dependant on their Husbands suport, women nowadays are independent persons in their own right.
If you are abused AOG you begin to feel worthless and after being told that you could not survive without them you begin to believe it - if after being verbally abused and continually told that you are rubbish and scum you eventually accept it and can't walk away - after all who would want someone who was rubbish and scum?
RR she has 2 sons who love her & prove she is worthy.
It is easy to be flippant and ask “why don’t victims leave?” (and here I am talking about domestic abuse victims generally – and of either sex). The answer to that is because they cant. By the time they realise that they are in a seriously abusive relationship it is too late. They are generally isolated from their friends and family; they have zero self-confidence; they often have no access to money; they are incapable of independent thought because their minds are so addled by the constant abuse, the sleep deprivation and the gaslightling; they are often watched (to the extent of bugs/cameras etc) so actually fleeing is impossible. If they do manage to flee, the abuser is generally quite good at persuading them that to return and that things will improve. Of course, they return – they do not have the strength of mind to resist the overtures that things will change. And then it starts again, but generally worse.

I recall the case of Jordan Worth being discussed a few weeks ago and the shocking abuse suffered by her boyfriend at her hands. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/16/controlling-girlfriend-first-woman-convicted-new-domestic-abuse/

I do not recall anyone asking "Why didnt he just leave"?
"she could have simply walked out on him"

People fail to walk out on relationships simply because they fear to hurt feelings, let alone when they fear their safety. I can't imagine the situation she was in. But it doesn't excuse her actions.
Jno's Guardian link is the most detailed I've read and very interesting.

// They had been cleaning out the garage and she had put a hammer in her handbag //

So, premeditated then.
There's many reasons why people don't walk out
^^^^ I thought Columbo was dead ;*)
Rockrose

/// I have a hammer under my sink - I see it everytime I reach for the bleach or the washing up liquid ///

I should remove the hammer if I were you, much less serious if you just throw the bleach over him, then perhaps wash it off with the washing up liquid, to cover up your crime. :0)
LadyCG
/// I don't condone her actions but I think this woman has been through sheer hell. ///

Not a patch on the hell her husband must have gone through, and he won't ever be allowed to enjoy the rest of his life.
I must say, having read the Guardian link, it does paint a very different story to the one assumed at the start of this thread. She HAD left, they'd been separated a year and then they were going to reconcile! She seems tormented with jealousy and the hammer in the bag does suggest some premeditation - making it murder rather than killing??? - however I tend to think she's done 9 years and that's probably sufficient.
I would be interested in BM's opinion regarding those who have called the killing a murder and Sally Challen a murderer/murderess.

Am I correct in thinking that is potentially defamatory as the facts and any verdict are yet to be determined?
With most of the female Abers on here, seemingly supporting this women's action for the yeas she has had to endure what she had gone through, I ask them this: are you also in favour of capital punishment? Because that is what she carried out on her husband, and he didn't even face a trial.
With respect AOG no it is not!
We will have to wait the outcome of the new trial.

181 to 200 of 212rss feed

First Previous 7 8 9 10 11 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Sally Challen

Answer Question >>

Related Questions