Donate SIGN UP

Answers

161 to 180 of 187rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 Next Last

Avatar Image
Jackie@12.55.Err no they weren't. The Zulus were not 'fighting the invaders of their land'. In fact, Shaka Zulu was himself and expansionist Imperialist. The Zulu Empire he led in the 19th century forced out many other African tribes from the regions of their ancient settlement. Under his rule, the Zulus killed and enslaved other black South Africans of...
13:14 Tue 26th Jun 2018
woofy ..as I said never watched the whole thing not incilned to either
It’s years since I saw the film but I thought it quite memorable. I thoroughly enjoyed it …. but then taste in films, music, etc., is subjective. No one has an authoritative expertise in any of that.
murray my late, very beloved Dad used to have it on TV....and then used to show his appreciation of it by falling asleep. If we tried to turn over he would wake up and insist that he was not asleep but "just resting my eyes and listening" So while I couldn't say that I have actually WATCHED it right through, I have certainly sat through it enough times to have an opinion :) I miss my Dad and would love to have him with us snoring through films again so thank you to this thread for reviving a happy memory.
If it is a publicity stunt, then at least it’s for a good cause.

And I’m thoroughly enjoying the mental picture of the burghers of Folkestone as Sid James and co from ‘Carry on Girls’.
It's an excellent film showing the exceptional bravery of the British forces against savagery. If anyone doesn't like it, don't watch it- it happened, it's history, get over it. If you want something genuinlye to campaign about, try campaigning about the fictionalising of history by trying to rewrite the past to conform to current politically-correct influences.
If anything is potentially racist about this film, it is the fact that the Welsh are portrayed as better singers than the English :)
"...then taste in films, music, etc., is subjective. No one has an authoritative expertise in any of that."

Normally I'd agree, but Zulu is objectively a good film and anyone who says otherwise is wrong :)

jim :)
"It's an excellent film showing the exceptional bravery of the British forces against savagery. If anyone doesn't like it, don't watch it- it happened, it's history, get over it. If you want something genuinlye to campaign about, try campaigning about the fictionalising of history by trying to rewrite the past to conform to current politically-correct influences"

But that film DOES fictionalise history to a degree, as do most films based on historical events.... there are many reasons to defend it but factual accuracy is not one of them.
the fictionalising of history

like pretending a battle happened in the daytime when it didn't?
Seriously, though: I actually think there's a case to be made for thinking about whether films, books, etc, created in earlier times are ... what's the word... appropriate? -- for today. Certain comedy shows from the 1960s and '70s, etc, have clearly aged poorly, with the humour no longer so funny to modern eyes. I'd not advocate actual censorship, but it pays to be mindful of the environment in which something was created, and the message it sends out. A good "bad" example is The Birth of a Nation, which is a masterpiece of early cinema, let down only by its bizarre insistence that the KKK was somehow instrumental, in a good way, for the creation of the US.

I don't get why Zulu is a target, though. It always has seemed to me to be rather respectful of the Africans. Individually, they come across as equally brave, their cultural practices are respected, of course it features relatives of the historical Zulus -- and there's even one scene, at the beginning of the film, where one character disrespects the Zulu culture and is rapidly reprimanded (actually two, now that I think of it).

So I don't get the point of the 28 protesters at all. Maybe they haven't seen it.
could be Jno......could well be.....on account of the cameras.
Jim, //Zulu is objectively a good film and anyone who says otherwise is wrong :) //

You're not wrong. ;o)
Question Author
/// There is no difference between not wanting ‘12 Years A Slave’ made and not wanting Zulu shown. ///

Of course there are more likely to create a division between the races. Black folk continue into the 21st century to bring up the past history of slavery, instead of burying it into the past along with all the other atrocities that have been committed in the past by all races.

Knowing that slavery is like a red rag to a bull to black people, we do not want certain film-makers to portray these event so has to fit in with their particular agenda.

You made the connection with the film Zulu, the difference being that white people have not carried their hatred of the Zulus over into the 21st century.

Nice to know however that you still quote my very popular threads from years past, doesn't this say something of you?

Question Author
jno

/// like pretending a battle happened in the daytime when it didn't? ///

I was going to type a joke regarding the battle of Rorke's Drift taking place during the hours of darkness, but then I may have been accused of being racist, :0)
If you want it to be that historically accurate you could always close the curtains and turn the screen off and just listen to the sound, perhaps?
Question Author
I think that the film Zulu was rather a strange choice, in aid of a force's charity.

Why not a little more modern war film such as the Dam Busters, Battle of Britain or D-Day?

I am sure nobody would have objected on behalf of the Germans.

That's if anyboday truly objected in the first place.......
Question Author
Oh go on then, what the hell,

"Don't shoot until you see the whites of their eyes"

Don't know that the British ever "hated" the Zuus, did they?

Didn't Cetawayo roll up in London, full tribal gear("is that an assegai you've got in your...") for an audience with Queen Vicky causing English gentlewomen to swoon all across the kingdom?

http://www.sahistory.org.za/dated-event/cetshwayo-travels-london-request-he-should-be-restored-king-zulu-kingdom

161 to 180 of 187rss feed

First Previous 6 7 8 9 10 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Should The Superb Film Zulu Be Banned?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.