Assange Ruling - Un

agchristie | 11:39 Thu 04th Feb 2016 | News

46 Answers

How controversial is this ruling going to be?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35490910

Is Any Charity To Be Trusted.?

Frightening, Sickening, But The Politicians Across Europe Are The Ones Responsible For This.

Answers

41 to 46 of 46

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by agchristie. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

agchristie

Question Author

TCL - Excellently researched. Many thanks for that. Why then did they have an Australian panellist knowing that representative couldn't vote? What would have happened if the vote was split? Who had the casting vote?

I was wondering what nationalities comprised the full panel!

agchristie

Question Author

> But Sweden isn't some banana republic and it should be trusted to proceed with their investigation.

They would if they got the chance but I fear the deadlock is such that Assange will stay put for another four years and the remaining Swedish charges would be spent.

As I stated earlier, the Swedish prosecutors were heavily blamed as well by the judiciary for their handling of the matter

mikey4444

agchristie...no one has come out of this covered in glory, that's for sure !

THECORBYLOON

The Group's been going since 1991 and there are elections each year but members can be re-elected so there may be investigations about their country or its citizens after that election where they cannot be involved

The Australian joined in August 2015, the Ukrainian in 2010 and the other members in 2014.

agchristie

Question Author

> no one has come out of this covered in glory

Absolutely, Mikey, you couldn't make it up. It's a very slow burner and an intriguing situation....

agchristie

Question Author

TCL - cheers for that.

I wonder deep down what the Ukranian official thinks about his colleagues' decision!

41 to 46 of 46

First Previous 1 2 3