Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Rise Of The Far Right In Britain
Beware if you see any reference to a new Party called " Britain First" It is in effect a new Far-Right party, formed by ex-Members of the BNP ::
http://
It might look quite cuddly and very patriotic, with its images of the Queen, poppies and suchlike but its the same tired old band of Fascist thugs, for whom Asians are the new Jews. I have warned about the rise of the Far Right on AB before, especially in Europe but these Fascists are marching in Britain, not Berlin. We ignore these racist thugs at our peril.
http://
It might look quite cuddly and very patriotic, with its images of the Queen, poppies and suchlike but its the same tired old band of Fascist thugs, for whom Asians are the new Jews. I have warned about the rise of the Far Right on AB before, especially in Europe but these Fascists are marching in Britain, not Berlin. We ignore these racist thugs at our peril.
Answers
AOG - "Passages taken from the Wikipedia link, can't see anything untoward here. /// In May 2013, following the murder of Lee Rigby, Britain First released a video threatening to place Islamist cleric Anjem Choudary under citizen's arrest if the Metropolitan Police would not arrest him. ///" I see something untoward there - the willingness of an...
11:53 Mon 27th Oct 2014
Orderlimit - "I'm afraid some of your comments and rediculing of JW's could fall into the same caterogry as racism (hate incident) if reported to the police. It's not nice and a bit of a contradiction, sorry."
Ridiculing someone is not a 'hate crime', and one cannot be 'racist' against a religious sect - religion is a choice, ethnicity is not.
Ridiculing someone is not a 'hate crime', and one cannot be 'racist' against a religious sect - religion is a choice, ethnicity is not.
AOG - "
andy-hughes
/// But the evidence does back up my view point - doesn't it? ///
In your opinion maybe, and everyone has the right to voice their opinion."
No - that is not a matter of my opinion - it is a matter of fact.
My opinion - people starting a post with either 'So...' or 'So you think ...' is going to be followed either with a complete contradiction of what the original post said, or it is going to be something that the original post did not say at all.
Fact - that is exactly what you did with your post commencing 'So you think ...'.
andy-hughes
/// But the evidence does back up my view point - doesn't it? ///
In your opinion maybe, and everyone has the right to voice their opinion."
No - that is not a matter of my opinion - it is a matter of fact.
My opinion - people starting a post with either 'So...' or 'So you think ...' is going to be followed either with a complete contradiction of what the original post said, or it is going to be something that the original post did not say at all.
Fact - that is exactly what you did with your post commencing 'So you think ...'.
mikey4444
/// There is a common factor running through all these cases of paedophilia and child abuse, and it isn't religion or race......its men. ///
And here was you just a few minutes ago accusing me of generalising all Muslims.
Not all cases of paedophilia are committed by men, it is just more widely reported.
http://
/// There is a common factor running through all these cases of paedophilia and child abuse, and it isn't religion or race......its men. ///
And here was you just a few minutes ago accusing me of generalising all Muslims.
Not all cases of paedophilia are committed by men, it is just more widely reported.
http://
mikey - "AOG...of course some padophilia is committed by women but the vast majority is committed by men. To suggest otherwise is just mischievous. Don't drop any more red herrings into this debate...please !"
As regulars on the AB will know, AOG and I diagreeing and arguing is about as likely as the sun rising tomorrow, but i do feel on this occasion I have to speak up on his defence -
from my experience, AOG's factual input into any thread is always valid, and I have never known him to chuck in any red herrings - and I honestly do not feel he is doing so now.
I think his referal to female paedophilia is the in the interest of factual balance, rather than being rooted in deliberate mischief-making.
As regulars on the AB will know, AOG and I diagreeing and arguing is about as likely as the sun rising tomorrow, but i do feel on this occasion I have to speak up on his defence -
from my experience, AOG's factual input into any thread is always valid, and I have never known him to chuck in any red herrings - and I honestly do not feel he is doing so now.
I think his referal to female paedophilia is the in the interest of factual balance, rather than being rooted in deliberate mischief-making.
andy-hughes
My opinion - people starting a post with either 'So...' or 'So you think ...' is going to be followed either with a complete contradiction of what the original post said, or it is going to be something that the original post did not say at all.Fact - that is exactly what you did with your post commencing 'So you think ...'.
Fact - that is exactly what you did with your post commencing 'So you think ...'.
Not at all conclusive
My opinion - that fellow is going to fall down that hole when he goes round the corner.
That man did fall down the hole when he went round the corner, yes it was true that is what happened, but not because of your opinion.
My opinion - people starting a post with either 'So...' or 'So you think ...' is going to be followed either with a complete contradiction of what the original post said, or it is going to be something that the original post did not say at all.Fact - that is exactly what you did with your post commencing 'So you think ...'.
Fact - that is exactly what you did with your post commencing 'So you think ...'.
Not at all conclusive
My opinion - that fellow is going to fall down that hole when he goes round the corner.
That man did fall down the hole when he went round the corner, yes it was true that is what happened, but not because of your opinion.
