Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
The Wisdom Of Crowds?
147 Answers
Was interested to see the following article in The Independent:
http://
It seems that the British public actually tends to believe grossly inaccurate things about their society compared to the evidence available. These findings are supported by an earlier survey commissioned by the TUC and carried out by Ipsos-Mori:
http://
//On average people think that 41% of the entire welfare budget goes on benefits to unemployed people, while the true figure is three per cent.
On average people think that 27% of the welfare budget is claimed fraudulently, while the government's own figure is 0.7%.
On average people think that almost half the people (48%) who claim Jobseeker's Allowance go on to claim it for more than a year, while the true figure is 27.8%.
On average people think that an unemployed couple with two school-age children would get £147 in Jobseeker's Allowance - more than 30% higher than the £111.45 they would actually receive - a £35 over-calculation.
Only 21% of people think that this family with two school-age children would be better off if one of the unemployed parents got a 30 hour a week minimum wage job, even though they would actually end up £138 a week better off. Even those who thought they would be better off only thought on average they would gain by £59.//
Do ABers believe this evidence, or should we continue to place more trust in the 'man on the street' than on evidence deriving from research?
http://
It seems that the British public actually tends to believe grossly inaccurate things about their society compared to the evidence available. These findings are supported by an earlier survey commissioned by the TUC and carried out by Ipsos-Mori:
http://
//On average people think that 41% of the entire welfare budget goes on benefits to unemployed people, while the true figure is three per cent.
On average people think that 27% of the welfare budget is claimed fraudulently, while the government's own figure is 0.7%.
On average people think that almost half the people (48%) who claim Jobseeker's Allowance go on to claim it for more than a year, while the true figure is 27.8%.
On average people think that an unemployed couple with two school-age children would get £147 in Jobseeker's Allowance - more than 30% higher than the £111.45 they would actually receive - a £35 over-calculation.
Only 21% of people think that this family with two school-age children would be better off if one of the unemployed parents got a 30 hour a week minimum wage job, even though they would actually end up £138 a week better off. Even those who thought they would be better off only thought on average they would gain by £59.//
Do ABers believe this evidence, or should we continue to place more trust in the 'man on the street' than on evidence deriving from research?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Kromovaracun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Sharingan, how very silly.
Octavius. Education for one, where children are being educated alongside many others who don't speak English - and safety for another. Gays, and girls in clothing deemed to be unsuitable are harassed in the street. People do have genuine concerns - and dismissing them out of hand is unfair and short-sighted.
I've got to go out now.
Octavius. Education for one, where children are being educated alongside many others who don't speak English - and safety for another. Gays, and girls in clothing deemed to be unsuitable are harassed in the street. People do have genuine concerns - and dismissing them out of hand is unfair and short-sighted.
I've got to go out now.
Do you have statistics for that, as the stats I have seen only refer to english as a second language, thus one could assume they can speak english in some form. My daughter goes to school with a Spanish girl, it amuses me that she sometimes comes home and tells us of a spanish word or phrase she has learnt.
As regards gay bashing and female intimidation, I think (although inexcusable) this has been going on since the arrival of the very first immigrants to Briton. It even goes on the British Army today.
As regards gay bashing and female intimidation, I think (although inexcusable) this has been going on since the arrival of the very first immigrants to Briton. It even goes on the British Army today.
//As regards gay bashing and female intimidation, I think (although inexcusable) this has been going on since the arrival of the very first immigrants to Briton. It even goes on the British Army today. //
That's ok then, as long as it goes on in the army then it's fine everywhere.
Inexcusable - sigh.
That's ok then, as long as it goes on in the army then it's fine everywhere.
Inexcusable - sigh.
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
Songs That Should Have Been Number 1
Music15 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles18 mins ago
What Do You Think Of The King's...
News169 mins ago
