Fox/Werritty report cover up.

[Gromit]

So the official report says the activities were wrong but he did not gain finacially. The official report was supposed to end our suspicions of foreign powers influencing the Defence Minister. But it fails to name anyone who funded them, or who they are affiliated to. This reportwill leave more questions than answers.

http://www.dailymail....nging.html?ito=feeds-

Was he a "Useful Idiot" in the pay of Mossad, as the Daily Mail reported?

[rov1100]

It now appears that Fox was so taken in by the 'Atlantic Bridge' and Werrity backing him all the way that their desires for Right Wing autocracy caused them to act illegally to achieve their aims.

Their are many in this country who feel we have already worked to closely with the US and many of our brave soldiers have died fighting the US cause. Where are the politicians of the Wilson era who refused to get involved in Vietnam.

Can you imagine any Prime Minister saying NO from the US for help in a future Vietnam?

[sandyRoe]

I can't imagine any future Tory PM saying "No".

[birdie1971]

I was just about to post the question - Who did Fox think was financing Werritty? It turns out that the answer is Fox himself. This from the Guardian about three hours ago...

“... [Fox] blocked civil servants attending key meetings alongside Adam Werritty, failed to tell his permanent secretary that he had solicited funds to bankroll his close friend, and ignored private office requests to distance himself from the relationship...”


http://www.guardian.c...dict-failure-judgment