Donate SIGN UP

Why is it Madonna is criticised???

Avatar Image
Nosha123 | 14:20 Mon 30th Mar 2009 | News
13 Answers
OK.. I wondered.. why is it Madonna adopts David Banda from Malawi and is slammed in the press yet Angelina Jolie adopts 3 (or is it 4 now?) foreign children and gets no negative press at all.
Madonna adopts child No.2 who was dumped in an orphange by the extended family and gets slammed AGAIN. Yet AJ doesnt.

AJ and Brad have made it clear they want even more natural children and adopted - yet never seem to get the press slating them the way Madonna does.

Why is this I wonder?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Nosha123. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I thought Madonna had adopted two children David and Jesus
Why does she go all the way to Malawi and spend millions in backhanders to adopt a little black boy when she can get Shaun Wright-Phillips for �10 million
Nosha:

If only the media would stop ramming all this meaningless twaddle down our throats every time we had some attention-seeking egomaniac of a so-called "celebrity" (God I hate that word) desperately seeking front page and primetime TV coverage, then we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

Thatcher once said that the IRA didn't deserve the "oxygen" of publicity, and neither do these idiots !
because the men and women cant stop drooling at brad and ang for long enough to find fault.

lol@ elvis, awww little shaun!
i personally think what shes doing is a fab thing, shes taking a child out of a poor deprived exsitance and giving it a home, education and love, whats so wrong with that? good luck to them i say!
Newspaper men don't like Madonna because they know that in a arm-wrestle, she'd beat them.
The press have had a thing against madonna ever since the incident in Argentina, when she hand balled that foot ball.
she's too old to be adopting children.....
see thats another thing i cant understand over in this country. It seems as soon as you turn 35 your written off to be a good adoptive parent, surely and older person giving a child a home and love is better than keeping them in a home!
Lets see ....

rich white woman goes to Africa & buys poor black baby

.....nope , can't see any problems there
brad and ang got a critical write up in this weekends sunday times - can't find a link to the article but the gist of it was they the rode over human rights in their pursuit of adopted kids and the perfect setting for their natural births (e.g. total control over an african state).

Could it be because Brad and Angelina are a Mum 'n' Dad (which is what most kids seem to want), while Madge is a rich, attention seeking celebrity, who has recently gone through a break up and is looking for something else to (temporarily ?) fill a gap in her life while keeping on her high-profile career (it's not as if she needs the money to support her family) ?

.... just a thought. I'm not making any judgement
equally perhaps b and A didnt bypass all procedures. Yes children are put in orphanages abroad but mainly as their parents cannot afford to care for them . If they had the money Madonna paid for the baby to care for them themselves theen surely it would be better for the child to be brought up by their parents. Besides there are huge cultural implications with bringing non national children up as national children disregarding their names , language and culture as well as their biological family

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Why is it Madonna is criticised???

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.