ChatterBank4 mins ago
Miss Greta Tonight
298 Answers
Anybody going to watch ?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Samuraisan. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//I would consider manipulation of a child in this way to be abuse, but I'm not an unhinged climate moron willing to exploit my child.//
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts.
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts.
Mozz, I think Andy's "moron" jibe was aimed at Greta's parents, not you. It was not a worthy contribution to the discussion, but Andy does seem to get a bit hot under the collar when presented with any disagreement; that's why he and Naomi are a good match. Neither wants the other to get away with the last word.
Mozz - // //I would consider manipulation of a child in this way to be abuse, but I'm not an unhinged climate moron willing to exploit my child.//
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts. //
You're quite right, what I said had no relevance to anything you said, so quite why you would imagine that my comment was aimed at you is a complete mystery.
Unless you have kept it quiet about being a parent to Ms Thunberg, my observation is clearly not aimed at you in any way shape or form - so I am happy to continue to respond to your posts.
For the record, I would anyway - that's not a choice you get to make.
Was that aimed at me, because if it was, where the *** did that come from, because it had no relevance to anything I said. If you can't conduct a civil conversation, I'd rather you disregard my posts. //
You're quite right, what I said had no relevance to anything you said, so quite why you would imagine that my comment was aimed at you is a complete mystery.
Unless you have kept it quiet about being a parent to Ms Thunberg, my observation is clearly not aimed at you in any way shape or form - so I am happy to continue to respond to your posts.
For the record, I would anyway - that's not a choice you get to make.
Atheist - // Andy, you seem to be a slightly unhinged enemy of this young woman, with a bit of a fixation on her. //
Nothing I have said on this thread or any other points to me being an 'enemy' of Ms Thunberg - just her parents and their fellow manipulators, I think she is innocent and used.
// You certainly don't have any respect for young people's views. //
Please see the response above.
// Why aren't you writing your music articles, instead of obsessing here? //
I am not 'obsessing' as you put it - and I can actually do more than one thing at a time - and indeed I am doing - in the middle of a feature right now.
Nothing I have said on this thread or any other points to me being an 'enemy' of Ms Thunberg - just her parents and their fellow manipulators, I think she is innocent and used.
// You certainly don't have any respect for young people's views. //
Please see the response above.
// Why aren't you writing your music articles, instead of obsessing here? //
I am not 'obsessing' as you put it - and I can actually do more than one thing at a time - and indeed I am doing - in the middle of a feature right now.
//You're quite right, what I said had no relevance to anything you said, so quite why you would imagine that my comment was aimed at you is a complete mystery//
I meant was your post in general aimed towards me, as I said in a subsequent reply, I knew the actual insult wasn't. My point was, and remains that we were in the middle of a civil conversation, when you suddenly explode into a mini rant which had nothing to do with the discussion in hand.
Seems to be a rather random exclamation, and as we were in discussion at the time, surely you can understand why I may have thought your outburst was a part of it.
I meant was your post in general aimed towards me, as I said in a subsequent reply, I knew the actual insult wasn't. My point was, and remains that we were in the middle of a civil conversation, when you suddenly explode into a mini rant which had nothing to do with the discussion in hand.
Seems to be a rather random exclamation, and as we were in discussion at the time, surely you can understand why I may have thought your outburst was a part of it.
Mozz, I tend to type as I think, but I never throw insults at AB'ers, although I am happy to do so at people I am confident won't see what I write.
If you felt my conversational swerve made you uncomfortable, it was absolutely not my intention - please accept my apologies for any offence when none was intended.
If you felt my conversational swerve made you uncomfortable, it was absolutely not my intention - please accept my apologies for any offence when none was intended.
"Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future" -- 13th January 2021
https:/
Unfortunately, no game.
https:/
Unfortunately, no game.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.