Donate SIGN UP

Deposit Protection Scheme

Avatar Image
Janer1 | 14:00 Thu 11th Dec 2008 | Law
1 Answers
If a tenancy is in joint names, and there is only 1 tenant who is barefaced enough to claim 3 times the deposit as due to ignorance the deposit wasn't protected, is it 50% that can be awarded, or is the claim valid at all?

Also, what timescale is needed to make the claim - can the claim be made after the deposit was paid back.

Also, if the tenant accepted the return of the deposit, could this be said to be full and final settlement or should they have returned it to make a claim.

Any help will be appreciated with this. Many thanks.

Gravatar

Answers

Only 1 answerrss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Janer1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Unfortunately I do not think it good news for you (if you are the Landlord) Ignorance of the scheme is an excuse I'm afraid

The 3x the deposit figure is the set penalty so is not a figure picked out of thin air. I also do not think it is relevant that the tenant has the deposit back, but I am not sure about the joint tenancy and one claiming or about timescales

Have a look at the DirectGov website http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TenancyDeposit/DG_ 066380 as that has good info on it
or Landlord Zone is quite good.
http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/

Only 1 answerrss feed

Do you know the answer?

Deposit Protection Scheme

Answer Question >>