Donate SIGN UP

Family Names

Avatar Image
carras | 21:17 Sat 05th Nov 2005 | History
4 Answers

While tacing family trees I have noticed that most children pre-1950 had a middle name which was the surname of a grandparent or other ancestor.


Was this a tradition?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by carras. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It was in many families, my own father had his maternal grandmother's surname as his middle name, which was Spencer. This was often not just a mark of respect and acknowledgement to the family, it was also a long standing tradition to keep reusing certain surnames as Christian names and this is sometimes a good clue when researching.
Actually, I believe this still goes on, I have a middle name, and so do most of the people I know, but whereas in the past, most middle names were after a family member, deceased or otherwise, today they are most likely to be named after someone famous, and occasionally, someone has been named after a complete football team.
My surname is Howard. When my brother's boy was born his partner, a Take That fanatic, wanted to call him Mark Gary Joson Robbie Howard. My brother went down on his own and registered him as Mark Christopher Cantona Howard...

All the male descendants of my paternal grandparents bear my grandmother's maiden name, usually as a third forename. I was born in the 1940's, and my father's generation was born just before WW1. So it was certainly a tradition in my family. Some of my contemporaries carry a second name from the same or similar origin. So, if not an out-and-out tradition, it was certainly a regular feature pre-1950.


Dare I also suggest it was both more sensible and more useful than the current trend to name children for a short-lived celebrity?

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Family Names

Answer Question >>