Donate SIGN UP

No female heirs to the throne

Avatar Image
lafrancaise | 18:30 Sun 12th Nov 2006 | History
6 Answers
If females couldn't be heirs to the throne, who would have been heir to George VI?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by lafrancaise. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Duke of Gloucester would have been king. His father was the next male heir of George the fifth father of George the sixth. He had two children William who died in a plane crash in 1972 and Richard our present Duke of Gloucester.
Question Author
Thank you for that jennymac. Could you tell me what relation the Duke of Gloucester was to George VI and what the duke's name was?
As Jennymac hasn't come back on this - the late Duke of Gloucester was a brother to George VI and his name was Henry
If females were unable to inherit, wouldn't that mean that Victoria would not have been queen, so George VI would never have been on the throne? You would have to go back the Hanoverians to work it out.
If females were unable to inherit there would have been no Hanoverian Line either, since George I traced his lineage to James I and Charles I through his mother, Electress Sophia of Hanover.
Question Author
Thanks everybody. As Mary Tudor was the first real Queen I'll have to go back quite a way, but it'll be interesting to find out who would be King today.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

No female heirs to the throne

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.