Donate SIGN UP

Can Anyone Explain This Question Pls?

Avatar Image
Malikavi | 11:08 Tue 23rd Mar 2021 | Body & Soul
5 Answers
Rohanda byrne has wrote in a book that

It has been observed in laboratories. That when you collide a positron (e+)a positively charged electron and also the electron anti particle with an electron (e-) can negative charge particle)

There is an explosion are annihilated and out of that annihilation gamma-Ray photons are created LIGHT AND LIGHT at higher energies for that matter.

Yes when positive and negative come together ,they birth light..light for love

My question is I have heard gamma-Ray is very dangerous , how can she mention its love?

I don't understand this ..pls explain

Sorry for my English
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Avatar Image
I wouldn't apologise for your English, when you're trying to decipher what is basically drivel. For the record: it's true that, if you collide an electron and positron together, then two gamma-ray photons are produced*. That's a result of physics. But to then say "when positive and negative come together they birth light for love" is just babble. Maybe you...
11:17 Tue 23rd Mar 2021
Dunno - bit of a mystery that!
I wouldn't apologise for your English, when you're trying to decipher what is basically drivel.

For the record: it's true that, if you collide an electron and positron together, then two gamma-ray photons are produced*. That's a result of physics. But to then say "when positive and negative come together they birth light for love" is just babble. Maybe you can make a nice spiritual point about how balance in any relationship is important, but if so that's completely unconnected to particle physics.



*At least, that's one typical outcome, although there are other possible results of colliding electrons and positrons together. It's beside the point to go into detail, but it's worth mentioning because it underlines how silly Rohanda Bryne's interpretation is.
I would assume this is what we would call poetic licence and what a novelist might try to impress us with what love is, scientifically. A bit like John Nash and his "I've made the most important discovery of my life. It's only in the mysterious equation of love that any logical reasons can be found. "
Poetic licence is fair enough, although this appears to be connected to an entire philosophy/pseudoscience:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_attraction_(New_Thought)
Rhonda Byrne isn't a physicist so i'd take what she says regarding science with a pinch of salt

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Can Anyone Explain This Question Pls?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.