Donate SIGN UP

why does a decline in predators sometimes spell disaster for a other species?

Avatar Image
porphyro | 18:13 Thu 18th Sep 2008 | Animals & Nature
3 Answers
i.e. the animals they prey on?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by porphyro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I guess if the prey are free to live without being hunted they may rapidly expand and outstrip the available food supply?
I thought it was more the other way round? That if the number of prey species drops, the predators will drop accordingly. So the number of predators can be used to gauge the health of the ecosystem?
Basically I agree with Noweia.

However, as predators generally take the weakest of a species leaving only the fit to breed, without those predators a species might decline due to more outbreaks of fatal diseases and general health problems. - Just a thought.

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

why does a decline in predators sometimes spell disaster for a other species?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.