Will Any Animal Lovers On Here Please Sign This Petition?

ladybirder | 10:39 Thu 31st Aug 2023 | Animals & Nature

53 Answers

It's to stop Katie Price owning any more animals and here's why.

// 2 dogs have been ran over. Puppies were found dead drowning in a neglected swimming pool. A horse was run over on a motorway. Animals just go missing in her home never to been seen again. Her guard dog broke into her neighbours garden and killed their chickens. A dog trained to attack people also ripped her cat apart. \\

https://www.change.org/p/rspca-ban-katie-price-from-buying-anymore-animals

THANK YOU.

Have You Ever Climbed A Mountain?

Loros Bird Quiz

Answers

21 to 40 of 53

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

pastafreak

Best Answer

Signed...the woman is a menace to everything she comes in contact with. The rspca is no better if they do nothing.

11:36 Thu 31st Aug 2023

Go To Best Answer

ladybirder

Question Author

Thank you Pasta, Ken and Lottie.

I have to try, whether or not it does any good.

piggynose

Signed
It only took me about 30 secs!

naomi24

Nicebloke, I trust you’re going to let the RSPCA know you’re withdrawing your support. That’s important.

ladybirder

Question Author

Thank you Piggy.

nicebloke1

Like I said Naomi24 I don't waste my time on these organisations or anyone else for that matter that I may pay on a monthly/ yearly basis.
If they choose to do wrong, and that includes anyone I have an agreement with, household or other, I withdraw payment, I've lost count of the times that court action has been threatened, it never happened because the reward for winning is very poor on their part, mainly due to the smallish funds involved.
Getting back to KP, she thrives on this sort of speculation? and a lot of the time is how she has made her money.
The RSPCA will not act on hearsay, only solid evidence, and even the latter they will um and arr. Why? KP is the sort who will fight such action, hence the lawyers for the RSPCA will take longer to prove the case, costing an arm and a leg.
In my view petitions have very little affect if any, other than a front page story that's not been proved either way, in saying that it really wouldn't shock me that the hearsay is true, proving it is the problem.
I've seen cases of people abusing dogs on camera, no action from RSPCA?
And just to add, I stopped giving to the RNLI some time back due to them landing criminals on our beaches, I don't want my money used in that way. The old saying money talks, it's always done so, and always will. Just my personal choice of how to deal with such, its the only voice one has left sometimes, how others deal with it is their choice.

ToraToraTora

I would not give to the RNLI full stop, I used to know their techies when I worked for Barclays in Poole. They used to flash money around like Elton John. Now I'd happily go and buy a few pints for the guys that actually do the rescuing but their management is an opulent free for all.

naomi24

Nicebloke, I understand that but I think it important that organisations be made aware of the reasons. Within the past few years I’ve stopped supporting two charities - and they know why. If they’re ignorant of the reason they’re even more unlikely to mend their ways.

Hazlinny

Ladybirder/ I filled in details but did not receive any email asking me to confirm my email address so that my signature is added?

Gill1941

Signed. No problems.

ladybirder

Question Author

Sounds as if it hasn't worked then. If it went as far as accepting it and telling you to expect an email in response I don't understand why that's happened. Sorry, can't help Haz.

bednobs

what is to stop someone from making up these accusations? Who is it even urging people to sign and not providing proof? It's a REALLY shabby way to go about things IMO. How does ANYONEknow these things are even true?
I could start a petition that says "take ladybirder's dog away from her" and say all sorts of unkind or untrue things. If the person has no proof, why do it? If they do have proof take it to the RSPCA!

ladybirder

Question Author

I support the WWF, that's OK I believe. Plus a couple of local ones which I know are OK.

Hazlinny

That's it now - OK. Guess I was too impatient!
Signed and shared.

ladybirder

Question Author

Thank you for persevering Haz.

Bednobs if you don't want to sign that's fine.

bednobs

ok :)

nicebloke1

Naomi. The pin strips of such an organisation are already aware of what they are doing, and also aware of a certain number who have withdrawn their support, their only interest is the monthly balance sheet / deposits. One door closes , another one opens, this is how they operate. Regarding the likes of me letting them know that I shall not any longer be supporting them is like water off a ducks back, it will be a case of them shrugging their shoulders, that's why I can't be bothered. I am no more than a pin head of their operation,
and not under any illusion that my support will be missed, it would take thousands of people to take the same action like me to make any difference at all. The whole operation now in my view is just a business, a business out to make a big profit, year on year. And yes they do need to employ a certain amount of staff to be able to operate in a reasonable way, and to cover expenses, especially vet bills, however its now a gold mine for the few, very much like the high salaries paid to the none medical staff of the NHS. I can honestly say I've not seen one RSPCA van on the road for at least 25 years.
Getting back to KP, if it is true, and the RSPCA don't or refuse to investigate then more people should withdraw their support. It is pretty well known that KP is arrogant, aggressive and erratic, erratic people are normally the ones who make poor decisions on buying pets without thinking it through, on the face of it, its looking like she made a few, but who knows. KP acts first and thinks later.