ChatterBank5 mins ago
Should Lgbt Issues Be Introduced In Lessons From As Early As Reception Classes?
184 Answers
http://
/// Schools can make a ‘positive impact’ by incorporating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people into the curriculum from reception class up. ///
/// Schools can make a ‘positive impact’ by incorporating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people into the curriculum from reception class up. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
divebuddy
You wrote:
"So it isn't surprising that they think of them as little more than vermin."
Who are the 'they' that you refer to?
A remember about a month ago, when discussing gay hate attacks, you mentioned that because gay people flaunt their sexuality, some people have the attitude that this is just 'giving them the hiding that they deserve'.
I'm sure that you would agree the people who feel that attacking gay people simply because they don't like them, are filth and perhaps the country's best advert for planned parenthood?
You wrote:
"So it isn't surprising that they think of them as little more than vermin."
Who are the 'they' that you refer to?
A remember about a month ago, when discussing gay hate attacks, you mentioned that because gay people flaunt their sexuality, some people have the attitude that this is just 'giving them the hiding that they deserve'.
I'm sure that you would agree the people who feel that attacking gay people simply because they don't like them, are filth and perhaps the country's best advert for planned parenthood?
jack - I admire your restraint - I am incandescent with outrage, but i appreciate that, thanks to the view of people like divebuddy, then muddled inappropriate predjudiced nasty offensive rude and ignorant posturings are something you have had to learn to live with.
But that does not make it any better.
But that does not make it any better.
sp1814
/// LBGT issues cannot and will not be taught to reception age kids, because it's a topic which is far too complex for them to understand. ///
/// This is not what is being proposed ///
I suggest you read the report sp.
*** Schools can make a ‘positive impact’ by incorporating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people into the curriculum from reception class
up. ***
*** The report’s authors suggest that children as young as four or five should be taught about LGBT issues. ***
/// LBGT issues cannot and will not be taught to reception age kids, because it's a topic which is far too complex for them to understand. ///
/// This is not what is being proposed ///
I suggest you read the report sp.
*** Schools can make a ‘positive impact’ by incorporating lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people into the curriculum from reception class
up. ***
*** The report’s authors suggest that children as young as four or five should be taught about LGBT issues. ***
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
divebuddy - "jackthehat, If you read back you'll see that I didn't say normal people were justified in viewing gays as vermin. I said that if that was their only experience of seeing gays it wasn't surprising if they felt that way."
Actually divebuddy - if you apportion the rest of society with a rather wider and more tolerent view of behaviour than you have hitherto exhbibited on this thread, you might find that they don't tend to catagorise any one section of society based on the unpleasant behaviour of an extremely small minority.
If they did, all 'normal' people could be viewed in the same way that most people think of 'doggers' - it's not standard behaviour, some do it, the vast majority don't.
I think you have serious issues with homosexuality - your continued use of the word 'normal' to distance yourself speaks volumes of fear.
Don't worry, with the hostility and vitriol you almost physically radiate with your opinions on here, i am sure your body is safe from any 'men on the prowl'.
Actually divebuddy - if you apportion the rest of society with a rather wider and more tolerent view of behaviour than you have hitherto exhbibited on this thread, you might find that they don't tend to catagorise any one section of society based on the unpleasant behaviour of an extremely small minority.
If they did, all 'normal' people could be viewed in the same way that most people think of 'doggers' - it's not standard behaviour, some do it, the vast majority don't.
I think you have serious issues with homosexuality - your continued use of the word 'normal' to distance yourself speaks volumes of fear.
Don't worry, with the hostility and vitriol you almost physically radiate with your opinions on here, i am sure your body is safe from any 'men on the prowl'.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.