Donate SIGN UP

Lax Clueing

Avatar Image
crosswhit99 | 09:25 Thu 11th Jun 2015 | Crosswords
14 Answers
Musical sign could be left of centre (5,4)

X could be Y, but how ? This clue requires an anagram indicator !
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Avatar Image
Quite agree crosswhit, 'could be' on its own isn't an adequate anagrind as it does not convey a mixing up of the letters. A few sloppy clues in this week's puzzle, including Scottish prison having to bar the two of them, wearing nothing (9) Unfortunately BOTH isn't wearing O !
09:35 Thu 11th Jun 2015
Wouldn't 'could be' be considered the anagram indicator?
I agree 'could be' is the indicator.
Tenor clef - anagram - l of centre
Quite agree crosswhit, 'could be' on its own isn't an adequate anagrind as it does not convey a mixing up of the letters.

A few sloppy clues in this week's puzzle, including

Scottish prison having to bar the two of them, wearing nothing (9)

Unfortunately BOTH isn't wearing O !
AS Chelle says 'could be' is the indicator of an anagram.
Question Author
As BO has expanded on, 'could be' alone isn't sufficient, as we need an indication of how it could be, eg anagram indicator, container indicator, homophone indicator. After all, in every single cryptic crossword clue the definition 'could be' the wordplay. This is a relatively common error, but this setter should be experienced enough to know better !
How on earth is 'could be' not an indicator of an anagram?
You may not think it's a very good anagram indicator, but I honestly can't see what's wrong with it!
Re 'Scottish prison...' - doesn't the answer, containing 'booth' have 'both'/the two of them with an 'o' added, so 'wearing nothing'?
I think the point being made is the crossword convention that when A wears B, B surrounds A, as things worn, either physically or metaphorically, are carried on the outside. In this case the setter tells us that BOTH is wearing nothing (O) whereas in actual fact the opposite is the case.
Question Author
I will dig out some more examples, but in general with anagram clues there is a requirement for something that clearly indicates a disturbance or rearrangement of the letters or words in question. In this repect 'could be' would be a very poor anagram indicator.
Logophile, thanks for that. I'm not very good at dissecting clues, so the simplest option usually suits me. One meaning of 'wear' is 'consume' - so I can see Both consuming/wearing the O.
Unfortunately it's not that type of 'consume', so won't do as a containment indicator ('wear' in that sense means to 'use up'). At first sight this clue might seem OK, but an experienced setter/editor really shouldn't be slipping up so often.

1 to 14 of 14rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Lax Clueing

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.