Freedom Of Speech

Theland | 09:38 Sat 05th Dec 2020 | ChatterBank

54 Answers

Four minute video to alarm you.
https://youtu.be/dlrK7lRool4

Have A Laugh At This.

Blackbirds Seem To Be Hardy Creatures.

Answers

41 to 54 of 54

First Previous 1 2 3

woofgang

Best Answer

setting aside your opprobious wording, in the current circs, I would rather that the politicians were led by the scientists than that the scientists were led by the politicians.

00:32 Sun 06th Dec 2020

Go To Best Answer

ummmm

Theland - I owned a business and had 55 men working for us. Not once did I ask about criminal convictions.

New Judge

//Anybody applying for a job where they have to prove that they have no criminal convictions, (Disclosure/Barring), will still fall foul of this, as even though they may never have received a conviction , the, ''incident,'' itself will be recorded and disclosed.//

That would apply to any incident recorded by the police, not just the type mentioned here. Furthermore, it would only be disclosed by an enhanced DBS check which is only available to employers in a very limited number of situations.

10ClarionSt

He said; "show some leadership". What a laugh! Johnson has been nothing but a puppet for the "science" during this endemic. I know, Peter Whittle was talking about free speech, but there won't be any sign of leadership from Johnson about anything unless 'er indoors lets him. He's got to tell her that unless she lets him make some genuine decisions, then she'll have to do her own washing and ironing.

ummmm

Clarion - what utter nonsense.

woofgang

setting aside your opprobious wording, in the current circs, I would rather that the politicians were led by the scientists than that the scientists were led by the politicians.

Theland

Question Author

Opprobrious? Gosh a new word! Thanks!
But yes I agree.

10ClarionSt

:o) I just love this website! :o))))))))) Luv it!

10ClarionSt

That word opprobious is rather disgusting. Is it onomatopoeic?