Music0 min ago
Karen Danczuk
The attention-seeking selfie queen who very publicly left her husband, the father of her kids, for a younger hunk is apparently now a victim of her brother's sexual abuse. On ITVs Loose Women just now she repeatedly dabbed her eyes with a hankie though no tears were visible as she told her stories, and was rewarded with a standing ovation. Anyone else have their doubts?
Answers
The trouble with attention seeking wannabes on reality TV, as well as actors etc, is that they can act. A court obviously found him guilty of raping her so it is true but perhaps her performance on Loose Women was the problem. She acted tears well but the true emotion of tears wasn't there. Maybe she just over practiced it.
20:08 Fri 02nd Dec 2016
http:// tinyurl .com/jl 4djp2
Why would you have doubts? There are none in my mind, she's a victim of an evil man who's been convicted of his crimes.
Why would you have doubts? There are none in my mind, she's a victim of an evil man who's been convicted of his crimes.
I don't doubt her account of what happened, and her abuser has been convicted. She has the right to leave her husband if she wishes, she has the right to take a younger lover if she wishes, and she has the right to cry in wherever and in whatever way she wishes. No one else has the right to judge her on any of those issues. So I don't think any of these issues should be held up as evidence of the alleged unreliability of her story.
-- answer removed --
The trouble with attention seeking wannabes on reality TV, as well as actors etc, is that they can act.
A court obviously found him guilty of raping her so it is true but perhaps her performance on Loose Women was the problem. She acted tears well but the true emotion of tears wasn't there. Maybe she just over practiced it.
A court obviously found him guilty of raping her so it is true but perhaps her performance on Loose Women was the problem. She acted tears well but the true emotion of tears wasn't there. Maybe she just over practiced it.