Donate SIGN UP

Strictly Final

Avatar Image
vernonk | 20:13 Sat 21st Dec 2013 | Film, Media & TV
88 Answers
This is the order I'd like to see them finish in:
1) abbey
2) Sophie
3) Natalie
4) Susanna

What do you think?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 88rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Avatar Image
It wasn't a joke at all. The best person with no dance training won. It would have been a farce if Natalie, who states on her cv that she is a highly skilled dancer and has had dance lessons since the age of 3, won. Well done, Abbey! And it is a shame Sophie was eliminated after the first half. She was superb
23:07 Sat 21st Dec 2013
Does it really matter.Decision already made.
Question Author
Eh? No, it isn't.
Just ask the wife LOL.
I hope Abbey wins, think Natalie should be next then Sophie then Susanna though I've heard Susanna is a bit of a dark horse in the ratings! Natalie doesn't seem to rate to high on popularity, her dancing it good but I feel a bit like Denise Van Outen in a previous year that they had a bit of an advantage going in but some found it hard to warm to her.
Yes it's all to do with her treatment of Tyrone and the baby.
I don't watch Corrie so didn't see any of that, sounds like the character wasn't a popular one though!
Also apparently a lot of money has been wagered on Susanna Reid.Therefore money means votes and therefore if it is"insiders" money the result could be not what some people would like.
I think the 4th best dancer will win but pray I an wrong , and that the dancer who has come the furthest will.
-- answer removed --
Can't make up my mind but Susanna definitely 4th
Abbey
Sophie
Susanna
Natalie
I cannot forget that Natalie had a bye one week. That meant she did not face a vote that week and therefore had an advantage over the others.
Question Author
But being truly honest, are our selections based on their dancing or how much we like them as people?
1) Abbie
2) Natalie
3) Sophie
4) Susanna

Question Author
Somehow I've had the impression that the BBC is wanting Susanna to win. But then what does it matter? Chris Hollins, a former winner, hasn't seen his career improve since. In fact, he no longer works with Susanna on BBC Breakfast.
I don't watch the programme but as it is always given maximum coverage in the newspapers, i cannot really avoid it. Today's mirror, for instance, informs us that Susanna Reid polled almost double the number of votes of her nearest rival, Sophie Ellis Bextor, after last weeks semi final. She also pulled in 38% of the votes in the quarter final, compared with just 15% each for her 3 rivals in tonight's final. My opinion, for what it's worth, is that most of those who bother to vote will have made their minds up weeks ago as to who they would like to see win. And it has nothing whatsoever to do with that person's dancing ability.
My local radio station has been telling it's listeners all week long to get behind Natalie simply because she was born in Burnley. Any of you change your minds AFTER you had seen them dance, tonight?
///But being truly honest, are our selections based on their dancing or how much we like them as people?///

We'll know at 8.30, I've a sneaky peaky feeling Nat won't dance again.....
But wasn't Susanna in the last two last week? Doesn't that mean she had less Votes than the other women?
And after tonight's dances, I have voted for Natalie.
Natalie was in the final two last week, with Patrick. The judges voted Patrick off.

1 to 20 of 88rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Strictly Final

Answer Question >>