Goodlife - "... with all the sophisticated sciences and inventions have been used to try to help. But nothing has solved man’s problems..."
That is a rather disingenuous statement. How old are you Goodlife? Because if you're over the age of approximately 25 then man-made modern technology and man-made civilization has enabled you to be still kicking around, typing on your man-made computer keyboard, speaking to the world on the man-made internet using man-made electricity, etc.
Life expectancy in prehistoric times was about 26 years old. So I would have long since expired if I were wearing a loincloth and hunting mammoth. In the middle ages it had risen to 30 (at birth) and rose again to the dizzying heights of 64 (max) if you made it through puberty and into your twenties.
Take a look this Wikipedia page:
http://goo.gl/7Jnx
Even the dullest of intelligences can easily see that man-made technologically developed nations fair far better in the life expectancy stakes than those nations that are poor with little in the way of modern infrastructure.
Your above statement is deliberately misleading and overly simplistic. Has modern science solved all of man's problems? No. Has it solved a great deal? Yes it has. Has modern science eased the suffering of countless people on the planet who would have otherwise died in agonising pain regardless of how religious they were? Yes. Is modern science perfect? No.
What you should be asking yourself is: what has religion done to solve man's problems?