Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 40 of 122rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Avatar Image
Then they should make their way to the nearest safe country mikey- I'm crap at geography but I'm pretty sure the UK isn't the nearest one.
11:30 Fri 04th Sep 2015
Tambo...there have already been many 10,000's of deaths, amongst them many children. And there will continue to be more into the future. We need to address the problems in Syria head on, and that means talking to the Butcher Assad, even though that sticks in the craw to do so. As long as he is throwing barrel bombs out of plane doors onto his own citizens, the situation isn't going to get better.

By the way, he was massacring his own people long before ISIS came on the scene. But the west just looked on and did nothing.
ichkeria, //There presence there rather gives the lie to the idea that people are not fleeing to the first "safe" country. //

No it doesn't. The rest aren't fleeing to Lebanon and Jordan - they're coming to Europe.

I'll just repeat: the presence of thousands upon thousands of refugees in Lebanon and Jordan gives the lie to the idea that Syrian refugees have not been fleeing to the first safe country.
Many of those now fleeing to Europe have either had enough of refugee camps or have been encouraged and exploited by traffickers.
Or are the same brave peoplel who stood up to Assad in the first place (as of them pointed out: after Assad, we certainly aren't afraid of Orban!)

Given that I would long since have got fed up of a Lebanese refugee camp, and made enquiries elsewhere, I am not going to pass judgment on those who want to get the hell out
//The USA has been strangely silent over the refugee crisis....they have infinitely more resources and space to help out. //

Why single out the USA. Thousands of miles away?
Why not mention UAE. Egypt, Abu Dabai,Kuwait et al. All oil rich vast countries,Islamic and closer to home with loads of desert space.
Iraq taught the west to avoid mid east wars.

//By the way, he was massacring his own people long before ISIS came on the scene. But the west just looked on and did nothing. //

Mr Saddam was also massacring his own people and look how Iraq has turned out after Mr Bliar and Bush stepped in.We have IS running rampant around the M.E.massacring their own people . It would seem Iraq was better left alone by the West.
Worked out well for Lebanon the last time they took in refugees, didn't it?
(for anyone who can't remember, they took in 'palestinians', who embarked on the genocide of the indigenous people when they had built up sufficient numbers. And arms from the relief money, natch)
-- answer removed --
Derek Moore
A baby in the water
His family in pain
They're calling him a migrant
***s sake he's just a wean

A baby in the water
His likes, they must be stopped
If only they had said that
Of all the bombs they dropped

A baby in the water
We all should be ashamed
That the bankers ***ed the country
But the immigrants are blamed

A baby in the water
Face down in the sand
For want of common decency
Some aid, a helping hand

A baby in the water
He's not the only one
Weans are dead and drowning
Illegal migrants in the Sun

A baby in the water
From a boat without a sail
Branded as a criminal
By the *** Daily Mail

A baby in the water
How many more must drown
They're human beings not migrants
They should be welcome in our town.
//Many of those now fleeing to Europe have either had enough of refugee camps//
If they come here in the masses of numbers that are proposed they will have to get used to more refugee camps. We have only so many hotels here and Mikey's vast housing dream cannot be built overnight with all the utilities required as well.
They are fed up with refugee camps? They and their families are still alive and fed aren't they. Oh accommodation doesn't suit us. Lets swan over to the UK they provide B&B free.
Once again it would seem we have to accept these swarms on their terms.!!
"Why not mention UAE. Egypt, Abu Dabai,Kuwait et al. All oil rich vast countries,Islamic and closer to home with loads of desert space. "

Why would they want to go and be plonked in the middle of a desert ??
Why not?. The Arabs can get Vacation resorts built in the sea. They can provide refugee accommodation in the desert.
The British and Americans built Camp Bastion and Helmund in desert areas. Apart from incoming rounds they looked well appointed and cosy.
ichkeria, // Why would they want to go and be plonked in the middle of a desert ?? //

If they're really all running for their lives and it's a safe desert they should welcome it.
-- answer removed --
maggiebee, I wonder just how long that heart-rending sentimentality would last if a vast influx of immigrants compromised your lifestyle? How much would you be prepared to give up to accommodate them? Would you be happy to see the infrastructure of this country, health services, education, etc., buckle under the burden?
Usually Maggie, they put children's ages next to their poems, paintings etc.
Eg. Derek Moore, 8yrs.
I didn't even read that poem by Maggie, it's bad enough Facebook being awash with these "heart rending" posts and messages.
These refugees,it would appear have definite aims as to where THEY wish to go.
They surely realise that when Syria was relatively peace and calm say 20 years ago the likelihood of anyone trying to smuggle themselves into Syria would result in them being shot as spies.
These Syrians now believe they can enter a foreign country illegally (No papers) claim asylum and dictate where they want to go.
The Hungarians put them on a train to a refugee camp. They don't want that because it doesn't fit in with their plans.!!! They want,They want,They want.
They are dictating what they want under THEIR terms.
That does not demonstrate a true asylum seeker fleeing for their lives. If they have not been finger printed and gone through the process of asylum then Hungary have every right to send them to a refugee camp to do so.
Hungary are actually playing by the rules in this case and not just bundling them off to a country where the indigenous population does not want them despite what two faced Merkel suggests to the contrary.
-- answer removed --
Could this be the answer to our bedroom tax situation?
methyl
They should reside wherever they can be SAFELY accommodated. They should not be given a choice. There are logistics to consider and it isn't the right of the refugees to side step them.

21 to 40 of 122rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Immigrants

Answer Question >>