Donate SIGN UP

Good idea or not?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:55 Thu 22nd Jul 2010 | News
13 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/36an8jd

/// The aim was to foster understanding across social and racial divides to 'mark a rite of passage' into adulthood by engaging people with their own communities.///

Do these people live in the real world?

The idea in it's self is good, but I am afraid it will not get the response needed.

Instead of attracting a cross section of youngsters, ie class, ethnicity, etc, It will only attract the type of person that now attends Scouts, Guides, Boy's Brigade etc.at a cost of up to £1,400 each,it would be better to send them all away on a package holiday.

Cameron's original idea of making it compulsory was a much better idea, take the decision out of the child's hands, it's all a matter of discipline.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
yes
If it was compulsory, the fine, but as it is not then I agree with Ankou and only the middle classes and "above" will attend.
get the ar$eholes to do it as a compulsory measure!
get the ar$eholes to do it as a compulsory measure!

^^^What ar$eholes are you referring to Bobbi?
Question Author
sqad

/// If it was compulsory, the fine, but as it is not then I agree with Ankou ///

Why agree with ankou he just answered "yes" to my question "Good Idea Or Not"?

No mention of /// and only the middle classes and "above" will attend. ///
It's probably a good idea, but I can't see the yobs signing up to it.

The report ends by saying it was made clear that the aim was for all 16-year-olds to participate in the long term - but I'm not so sure that's entirely necessary or that it will be beneficial to everyone.
Extremely stupid idea (especially if it were compulsory).
Bring back National Service.
no
Are you really suggesting, McMouse, that the Armed Forces should have their limited resources diverted to accommodate the training of some 600,000 “recruits” every year?

What are they to do with them? Where will they be accommodated? Where will the resources come from to train and supervise them? The questions are endless. Compulsory National Service ended almost fifty years ago and there is no way on this earth that the UK could or would reintroduce it.

Mr Cameron’s proposal is equally preposterous. As has been said, it will be of interest to only a small minority of youngsters and their parents probably already see to it that they have access to any similar facilities that they wish.

Like many schemes and actions the government announces, in a week or two’s time it will be quietly shelved.
he was persuaded to stick to a voluntary scheme after advice from youth organisations.

Sub-title : It was pointed out to him that all those thousands of children he forced into voluntary "national service" would be getting the vote two years later

He's dumb enough to come up with bad ideas but not dumb enough to stick to them is he?
Question Author
Hang on before most of you dismiss this idea, is it all bad?

We now have vast amounts of children of all classes and races finishing school at the age of sixteen, finishing what they have been used to doing for eleven years, and that is getting up early in the morning and then travelling to a building where they are grouped together and under close supervision made to carry out various tasks.

There was no discussion at that early age of five, do you want to volunteer to go to school or not? This has worked fine for many, many, years.

So why not now extend this idea to make it compulsory from the age of sixteen to eighteen, to attend a centre, where they are taught adult skills, plumbing, electrical & electronic work, building skills and car mechanics. We have enough retired tradesmen that would be interested in using some of their spare time as instructors.

For all those that don't go on to further education, collage and uni, it would be an ideal foundation to help to build a section of youngsters that would otherwise be kicking their heels (or something else) on the streets.
Don't you get it?

Compulsory schemes against 16 year old will result in a huge number of pi$$ed off future voters.

How many of those made to sweep the streets of visit OAPs are going to vote Tory in 5 years to thank David for making them work for the community ?

It's political suicide

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Good idea or not?

Answer Question >>