do you think drug and alcohol testing should be introduced in schools,university,s,and at work.
22:33 Tue 18th Apr 2006
Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tomestone. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

1 to 15 of 15

Absolutely ''YES''

I have random drink/drug testing at my work, In reference to schools i don't have an issue with that either, if you,ve not done anything wrong, whats the problem

christ no, if Debenhams started that we'd all be in the canteen til 10am drinking black coffee! lol
dot, if your social life is going to interfere with work, what should the answer be?
i myself wouldnt have a problem with it but i think it may be another step down the road to a nanny state
laurie, marry a millionaire and stop at home, no work so no probs!
Very Good dot
no treating everyone as a criminal unless they can prove they aren't isn't how we should treat people as a general policy ...
absolutely definitely not at work. im an adult and what i do in my spare time is nobody else's business. i would see this as an invasion of my human rights.
a definate yes, like laurence says if you have nothing to hide then there shouldnt be a problem

Absolutely NO

It is an invasion of my (your) human rights. What I do in my own time is no body else's business.

If I choose to do drugs in my spare time and it's not impacting anyone else or my work, then it's none of their business (not that I do anymore but that's not the point).

I have been out for drinks on an evening when I have work the next day and I'm pretty sure it would be in my blood the next morning but it also doesn't impair my ability to work.

What exactly would it achieve anyway? Especially if someone is a good worker (which I am and was even when I used to dabble with recreational drugs on a weekend). Are you gonna expect employers to start sacking perfectly good employees just cos they had a good time at the weekend?

It's another step closer to a nanny state - we're all adults and as long as what we do in our spare time doesn't adversley affect others or our ability to do our job when we are in the workplace, WHY?

Lawrence 2, if your social life doesn't impact on your ability to do your job, what should the answer be?
YES. when you think of all the individuals who might be driving to work, college or university under the influence of drugs or alcohol and their potential to cause possibly fatal accidents while under the influence you'd all be the first to support it if you or a member of your own family ended up being a victim.
ditto flipflop.
well said flipflop!

Everyone in my company who works in a safety critical role is subject to random D&A screenings. No drinking while on duty (even in lunch hours) and if drugs are found in your system, it's instant dismissal. I think this is completely understandable for such a situation.

With regard to introducing such tests in other work environments which may not be safety critical, I would fully support a no alcohol policy in work time (ie, lunch time drinks) as I feel it slows responses and therefore means people are not at their most productive.

Drugs (out of hours) is a bit more complicated as it's about what an individual does in their own time but it should be remembered that the practice of taking drugs is illegal - as such, it's possible that if someone gets into trouble in their personal life, it could have an impact on their employer; (the way that Burberry, Rimmel and so on cut Kate Moss (temporarily) as soon as her drug taking became public, due to the impact on them).

As long as potential employees are fully aware of the company's stance on the matter prior to employment, then the individual can choose whether such a clause effects their life style.

If a company were to implement such a policy, any employees who already worked for them would be protected if they didn't agree with the stance as their existing employment contracts would not have this clause in them.

With regard to schools, at such a young age, any deterent is a good thing (in the same way that kids get detention to deter them from skipping classes).

At university, the students are adults and as such make their own choices. However, if a policy is implemented by a university, in the same way as an employer, as long as the students are aware, they can decide whether that's a university they want to go to.

1 to 15 of 15

Related Questions

(Hope this is law I'm posting in to). I've been involved in an incident where I was harassed in a bar with my friends by a group of guys who were been vulgar and following us around the whole bar all...
How does the entherohepatic cycle influence levels of drugs such as simvastatin in the blood?...
How do all? it's been a couple of weeks since I showed my face so I thought I'd pop my head through the AB door and say hello. I read a poem yesterday regarding drugs and I thought I'd share it - very...
To unfortunately be pretty blatant about it and I don't where else to ask, but there might come a time soon I get offered hormone therapy, but I'm really worried. I took an overdose in 2013, (a...
Mr Flump has been prescribed these and has only just started them. However he is totally zonked and has ' brain pain'. He doesn't tolerate strong painkillers too well, they make him dizzy. He has been...
Cryptic and quick clues have same answers 9a (cryptic) Edible mould's age is restricted by laboratory's review (6) 9a (quick) Dish of meat, fish, etc, cooked in a mould or shell (variant spelling) (6)...

Latest posts