I was watching a great programme last night that documented women from the late 1800's to 1940, 2 things surprised me, there was quite an amount of large women , there were also no women who were as thin as some of the celebs of today, they were what used to be normal sized women who were around a size 10 or 12.
anyway back to the OP, weightloss should be about lifetime changes, not a cabbage soup diet until a couple of stone disappears, I personally think he looks better a bit heavier.
He looks effeminate and totally girly - too polished and not at all good looking. She looks good but I could never work out what she did for a living - is she talentless?
indeed, awful, rather the smiley lovely chubby bloke we came to know and love, well some women obviously did, now he looks plastic and could fall down a drain hole no problem.
according to the article, he's lost 2st in 4 months, which averages out at approx. just under 2lbs a week. i always understood that a 2lb weight loss per week when on a diet is a good thing to aim for, so in that sense his weight loss seems sensible and not over the top.
personally i don't like him and never have but i think he actually looks, body-wise, very good, not too thin at all, just nice and slim.
the face and hair are another matter....yuk! definately doesn't float my boat.
I've always been a sucker for the 'jack the lad' type which Warnie certainly was - he looks like one of the usual buffed and puffed effeminate types so common today. Wasn't there a Mae West quote along the lines of "It was a time when men were men and women were glad of it" - my sentiments entirely