Continued...
The 'poppy guy' (Emdadur Choudhury) was charged with a Section 5 Public Order Offence (1986), which states - “... a person is guilty... if he... (a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or (b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.”
He was found guilty because he couldn't persuade the court that he had a valid defence to the charge.
I think that it was right and proper that he was charged and found guilty of the office. He has every right to protest about whatever he has a genuine grievance about. That right does not and should not allow him or anyone else to deliberately and knowingly alarm and harass others and cause them distress – particularly those who are at a funeral, grieving for their loved ones, regardless of what one thinks about the legitimacy or otherwise of the funeral ritual.
It's a blatant example of someone having the 'right' to do something without ever stopping to think about whether they have a responsibility to others not to exercise that 'right'.