Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > So, is it one rule for women sex offenders then?

So, is it one rule for women sex offenders then?

Avatar Image
Postdog | 19:22 Fri 25th Apr 2008 | News
47 Answers
Had this been a bloke, I bet you he'd be inside by now.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/lon don/7366909.stm
prev immigration too many
  
next Robert Peston
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 47 of 47rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Postdog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image 123everton
I've ust come back from a Christenining, so forgive me, but I thought we established that Ethel's link was out of date as under 13s cannot give consent.
22:19 Sun 27th Apr 2008
Avatar Image daffy654
Whether it is out of date or not doesn't matter,it still established that there are men who didn't go to prison for abusing children. There have been more recent cases but I really can't be bothered looking for any.
22:42 Sun 27th Apr 2008
Avatar Image 123everton
It does matter, because if the law's been tightened for that offence then they'd go to jail for it.
This offence was committed in 2008 not 2004.
What the questioner is suggesting is that the ofence warrants prison, regardless of gender, but (and I agree) if the offender is male he can expect a tougher sentance.
Perhaps we need mandatory sentances for certain offences acroos the board, because it appears to me that our judges are failing to provide justice.
08:49 Mon 28th Apr 2008
Avatar Image daffy654
I agree with mandatory sentences,if a person (male or female)is convicted of a sex crime they should go to prison for definite,they should also be placed on the sex offenders register for life not just a few years.
11:02 Mon 28th Apr 2008
Avatar Image sandrajo
The woman did wrong and should be prosecuted accordingly as should anyone that interferes with a child. I love how people attitudes changed when the pic was posted of her.

I find that link (NO JAIL FOR MAN WHO ADMITS SEX WITH GIRL, 12) which Ethel posted very disturbing news. So basically the judge said this guy was "mentally younger than his 20 years", and therefore decided not to jail him....so maybe this woman can state the same thing...she's not right in the head after all. People like this make me sick!
11:14 Mon 28th Apr 2008
Avatar Image DarkMajes71c
when i was 15 i slept with a woman who was 30+ and a well ex friends mum... he may have done the persuing and she was just foolish enough to fall for it... men tend to be more predatory when it comes to looking for a "mate" and when i was 14-(now) i was constantly looking for the next bit of skirt...
tbh it should be a fair with the sentencing for both sexes but i guess the above should be taken into account.
16:15 Mon 28th Apr 2008
Avatar Image 123everton
It does'nt matter how eager the child is. One of you is an adult, so one of you has to be the grown up, and say NO!
18:55 Mon 28th Apr 2008

41 to 47 of 47rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

So, is it one rule for women sex offenders then?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.