Donate SIGN UP

Wireless routers and energy consumption

Avatar Image
koster | 21:24 Sat 04th Aug 2007 | Technology
3 Answers
You often hear about not leaving TVs on standby, and all the energy that saves etc.

I wonder about wireless routers. Do they consume as much energy as a TV on standby?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by koster. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Don't really know - maybe some Googleing might get an answer. Maybe there is a wattage rating on the back so that you can compare it with a TV?

Some people I know switch them off when they aren't being used. Maybe I should?
I think most routers are the same and this is what Sky says:

Sky�s broadband router uses about six watts of electricity.

Based on continuous use, this results in an electricity cost of about �4 per year and carbon dioxide emissions of 22kg per year.

Television consumption varies enormously between size of sets, age of sets and crt and lcd and plasma.

As a guide, a 10 year 32" tv will use 150 watts on standby, and a 19" 'green' lcd will use 5 watts. An enormous difference as you can see.

On average, a router uses a lot less power than a tv on standy,
-- answer removed --

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Wireless routers and energy consumption

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.