How different would the UK be if we didnt have (or stop funding) our royal family?
Ive NEVER understood how giving millions of pounds a year to an already wealthy family is 'good' for Britain.
Ive just walked home through a dissused bus station where there are people sleeping in boxes and make shift tents.
The disparity is painful.
Right, we abolish the monarchy; so to where/whom do we send our 56p annually?
And how do we ensure that they spend it on the homeless.....and how do they distribute it?
We should give the money to Donald Trump and if he does not make it to president , he could become King of England instead. He has all the required qualities , billionaire , good at waving at crowds, out of touch with the working people , used to living in opulence while the peasants struggle to pay tents and eat from food banks ....yes let's have Trump as king
King Trump - we could fund his security and private jet. He could live in palaces and estates without having to spend any of his own billions. When he is bored he could even try to influence British politics as an unlected King.
My theory on the homeless is that we should give them the homes that we give to immigrants and put a block on more coming in ! I personally love the Queen and am more than happy for her to reign over us !
I awarded it to myself.
Was watching news where they were covering the Royals giving each other various honours and figured I would give myself a Knighthood.
I did consider a garter but my legs are too hairy and fat.
However as a peasant I look up to my betters such as Queen Camilla and Prince Edward. I also quiver in humbleness at princess Beatrice