Javascript must be enabled to use this form.

Web Site Search (click below)
Searching With Just One Click
 

News

Why was my question removed?

I was disapointed to discover that a recent question of mine dated 5/10/08 and titled "Muslims angered yet again, has been removed from Answer Bank.

This could not be because of any racist or offensive remarks that I had made, so I can only assume it was removed because THECORBYLOON reported fagidill and Lucy Thomas for their answers.

I do not know what they said because the question had been removed before I could read it. But I find it most unfair of AB to remove a person's question because some posters have presumably contaminated a question with their answers.


anotheoldgit  Mon 06/10/08 14:01
daniela31
Mon 06/10/08
14:03
Isn't this one more reason why we need a 'report this answer' facility???

LoftyLottie
Mon 06/10/08
14:07
The editor has made it very clear that the 'report this answer' facility will not be brought back. It has been questioned by several in the Suggestions topic, but Ed. remains steadfast in his decision. It is really stupid that whole questions are removed because people post unsuitable answers.

Repost your question AOG. Hopefully it will remain this time.
daniela31
Mon 06/10/08
14:09
send an e-mail to the ED....he's a very nice chap....and let him know of your grievance.
Maybe he will put your question back, minus any offending answers.
:-)
Ethel
Mon 06/10/08
14:10
Why would you assume Corbyloon reported it?


LoftyLottie
Mon 06/10/08
14:11
I assumed that Corbyloon had posted on AOG's thread that he was going to report these answers. I might be wrong.
LoftyLottie
Mon 06/10/08
14:13
(AOG didn't say that TCL had reported the question, Ethel)
sp1814
Mon 06/10/08
14:19
Lucy Thomas posted a comment which referred to 'p*kis and darkies'.

Can't remember exactly what fagidill wrote, but it was along the lines of getting rid of all Muslims or something.

I'm fairly sure that TCL said he'd report the answers. Personally, I would've let them remain so people can see exactly what kind of people these two are.
anotheoldgit
Mon 06/10/08
14:35

Question Author

Ethel

THECORBYLOON said he had reported them

I have reported fagidill & Lucy Thomas' posts, there is no need for racist and offensive statements

Extracted from the banned question, retrived from
"My Profile"/ "My Questions" fagidill's & Lucy Thomas's answes had been removed.

A.Guest
Mon 06/10/08
14:39
SK Sweden aka Newsdesk . . . . surely you are not THAT surprised that some of your comments are candidates for removal!
rov1200
Mon 06/10/08
14:39
I think there is a case for a questioner removing an answer to his question if he thinks it derogitory or inflammatory that will enable answers to flow that are more relevent. Self censorship is what we need!
LoftyLottie
Mon 06/10/08
14:54
I don't agree rov1200. People would get rid of all answers they didn't agree with, or posters they didn't like and the whole site would get even more cliquey - we just need the old system back where people could report answers and give a reason for reporting. Sometimes this system was abused, but there is no fullproof system.
A.Guest
Mon 06/10/08
14:59
Perhaps the nearest we will get to 'foolproof' is if the Editor bans people who get out of line and prevents them returning - EVER! But even that would need a different form of registration procedure to prevent the undesirables from re-registering. Don't you agree Newsdesk?
rov1200
Mon 06/10/08
14:59
In an ideal situation Lofty every question and answer would be vetted by a moderator. To do this more money, time and resources would be necessary. Moderator free websites are in the minority, we should all act responsibly so that it continues so by self editing would be an easy way out.
sir.prize
Mon 06/10/08
15:01
I distinctly remember Newsdesk (also known as SK Sweden) stating that he was the new moderator. That should have been posted in Jokes!!!
LoftyLottie
Mon 06/10/08
15:03
If we all acted responsibly it would definitely work. But I can't see us all acting responsibly!
Gromit
Mon 06/10/08
15:09
Bl00dy racists, causing us trouble eh, AOG.
terambulan
Mon 06/10/08
16:10
So no FREE-SPEECH on here either!
sp1814
Mon 06/10/08
16:16
terambulan

There's free speech everywhere. However, the problem that racists have now is that the vast majority of people (especially those under say, 40) don't want to hear the filth that spews forth from their mouths.

I really don't know what bigots have to complain about. They've been able to shout 'darkie', 'n*gger', 'p*ki' etc for decades. Surely they've had their fill???
terambulan
Mon 06/10/08
16:20
sp1814....your last comment is inverted racism. Talk about biting the hands that feed........?
sir.prize
Mon 06/10/08
16:22
terambulan - have a look at AB Suggestions - the Ed is online now. I'm sure he willput you right re: Free Speech.
Submit the above question and answers
 add to del.icio.us  add to digg  add to furl
 add to reddit  add to Technorati  add to Blinklist
 add to StumbleUpon  add to squidoo  add to ma.gnolia
 add to Cocomment  add to Netscape  add to Fark

Have Your Say

Do you think videogame addiction is a social or psychological problem?

Social 

Psychological 

Neither 

about us | [Ctrl + D] adds us to bookmarks Switch to UK Net Guide You are in The AnswerBank  switch to UK Net Guide