Music0 min ago
Coutts Have Been Telling Fibs
or at least being economical with the truth. Mr Farage's account was closed for political reasons and the views Mr Farage hold do not align with Coutt's. Going under the financial threshold had little to do with their decision. I hope he takes them to court as a result of unproved malicious allegations and slurs made against him.
https:/
https:/
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by retrocop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
In all the nonsense people are posting about this, the bank has apologised for the way his account was closed – but not that it was false that his account failed to meet the financial criteria to have an account with them; which is what the financial expert said was in their report (and the reason the account was closed).
So unless someone can post definitively that the bank admits that their report was false – I’m inclined to believe that bank and not Farage.
So unless someone can post definitively that the bank admits that their report was false – I’m inclined to believe that bank and not Farage.
In the youtube video in which the financial expert stated that the bank’s report said that Farage’s account was closed because he no longer met the financial requirements of having an account with them; Farage was also in the youtube video, citing from the report – why did he not point out that the financial expert was wrong – is he some sort of fool?
Read the report, Hymie, don't depend on some cove on YouTube doing it for you. I'm not going to do it for you either (though I've done it for myself). You will get the full lowdown on why Coutts closed NF's account and I can assure you it was not solely because he was too poor, For example:
"The Committee did not think continuing to bank NF was compatible with Coutts, given his publicly stated views that were at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation."
That's nothing to do with being poor. And there's much, much more where that came from which makes (to me anyway) chilling reading. I'm not sure anybody should be defending a bank which "cancels" its customers because of the political views they hold.
"The Committee did not think continuing to bank NF was compatible with Coutts, given his publicly stated views that were at odds with our position as an inclusive organisation."
That's nothing to do with being poor. And there's much, much more where that came from which makes (to me anyway) chilling reading. I'm not sure anybody should be defending a bank which "cancels" its customers because of the political views they hold.
Hymie at 1.50pm - you are incorrect, as is the financial expert you keep
on encouraging people to watch in your endless and pointless videos.
The bank, in their own report, has stated “…the client’s economic contribution is now sufficient to retain on a commercial basis”.
These are the Bank’s words, so the financial expert’s words count for nothing.
Man up and admit you are wrong.
Given the Bank’s words it becomes clear this was political.
on encouraging people to watch in your endless and pointless videos.
The bank, in their own report, has stated “…the client’s economic contribution is now sufficient to retain on a commercial basis”.
These are the Bank’s words, so the financial expert’s words count for nothing.
Man up and admit you are wrong.
Given the Bank’s words it becomes clear this was political.
