Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
Will You Still Tar Them With The Same Brush?
https:/
A sad story and my heart to all those who lost life,were injured or had to see this but the brave Tunisians clearly weren't in cahoots with the terrorist with many risking their life to try and stop him but as you can see it fell on deaf ears.
This is typical regarding groups as isis and other terrorist groups and many of the worlds muslims to my knowledge.
Many don't want their brand of murder,brutality and violent terrorism but the terrorists only hear the demons in their heads commanding them to kill innocent people.
Just a little food for thought.
Have a :) day.
A sad story and my heart to all those who lost life,were injured or had to see this but the brave Tunisians clearly weren't in cahoots with the terrorist with many risking their life to try and stop him but as you can see it fell on deaf ears.
This is typical regarding groups as isis and other terrorist groups and many of the worlds muslims to my knowledge.
Many don't want their brand of murder,brutality and violent terrorism but the terrorists only hear the demons in their heads commanding them to kill innocent people.
Just a little food for thought.
Have a :) day.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Broseph. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
One need only read the books that form the foundations of the Abrahamic religions to discover they are deeply instilled with bigotry, prejudice, misogyny and brutal violence.
The so called "extremists" are those who closely follow the teachings in these books. The so called "moderates" of these religions have simply ignored the parts they don't agree with.
The fact remains that every follower of any of the Abrahamic faiths is lending credence to the notion that "prophets" conveyed the word of God to us though the respective religious books. Hence they are in part responsible for the atrocities of the fundamentalists.
Only those who completely reject every aspect of the Abrahamic faiths can have a clear conscience on this matter.
The so called "extremists" are those who closely follow the teachings in these books. The so called "moderates" of these religions have simply ignored the parts they don't agree with.
The fact remains that every follower of any of the Abrahamic faiths is lending credence to the notion that "prophets" conveyed the word of God to us though the respective religious books. Hence they are in part responsible for the atrocities of the fundamentalists.
Only those who completely reject every aspect of the Abrahamic faiths can have a clear conscience on this matter.
Do you think that the gunman was sticking to these rules.Or just a madman using jihad as a excuse?
The rules of Jihad
The rules of Jihad
Two Pakistani soldiersIn recent years the most common meaning of Jihad has been Holy War ©
A military Jihad has to obey very strict rules in order to be legitimate.
•The opponent must always have started the fighting.
•It must not be fought to gain territory.
•It must be launched by a religious leader.
•It must be fought to bring about good - something that Allah will approve of.
•Every other way of solving the problem must be tried before resorting to war.
•Innocent people should not be killed.
•Women, children, or old people should not be killed or hurt.
•Women must not be raped.
•Enemies must be treated with justice.
•Wounded enemy soldiers must be treated in exactly the same way as one's own soldiers.
•The war must stop as soon as the enemy asks for peace.
•Property must not be damaged.
•Poisoning wells is forbidden. The modern analogy would be chemical or biological warfare.
The rules of Jihad
The rules of Jihad
Two Pakistani soldiersIn recent years the most common meaning of Jihad has been Holy War ©
A military Jihad has to obey very strict rules in order to be legitimate.
•The opponent must always have started the fighting.
•It must not be fought to gain territory.
•It must be launched by a religious leader.
•It must be fought to bring about good - something that Allah will approve of.
•Every other way of solving the problem must be tried before resorting to war.
•Innocent people should not be killed.
•Women, children, or old people should not be killed or hurt.
•Women must not be raped.
•Enemies must be treated with justice.
•Wounded enemy soldiers must be treated in exactly the same way as one's own soldiers.
•The war must stop as soon as the enemy asks for peace.
•Property must not be damaged.
•Poisoning wells is forbidden. The modern analogy would be chemical or biological warfare.
Wow. To the poster earlier...Your answers have no contribution to the op,carries no weight and is just about decipherable if you dodge the froth coming viciously at me from your mouth. If questions in the op are scary or you can't answer them then a quick "Agree" or "Disagree" will suffice as I know sometimes it may seem hard to join in strong debates which may be above your means of comprehension but if you need help answering or understanding then please just say so so that we as a collective can help you join in instead of feeling like the proverbial 3rd leg. I make my threads easy to understand and everyone and everyone is welcome,even those who throw childish insults around to boost their egos amongst their cohorts which really doesn't bother me as it didn't in school. You and your chums are always welcome on my threads on one condition, in between your insults,diversions and banter then at least have one answer or query directly associated to the op and after that if you feel the need to use me as your emotional punchbag as maybe things aren't quite so rosy in your life then do so on another thread and leave my threads clear please :)
Dustypuss are those the actual rules of engagement regarding Islamic Jihad? If so then they are blatantly not the rules that isis or most if all not terrorist groups use which then leads me to believe that these groups aren't muslim but use certain parts which they chop and change to suit their needs so aren't muslim at all if I'm correct?
Dustypuss are those the actual rules of engagement regarding Islamic Jihad? If so then they are blatantly not the rules that isis or most if all not terrorist groups use which then leads me to believe that these groups aren't muslim but use certain parts which they chop and change to suit their needs so aren't muslim at all if I'm correct?
"I make my threads easy to understand and everyone and everyone is welcome,even those who throw childish insults around to boost their egos amongst their cohorts which really doesn't bother me as it didn't in school. You and your chums are always welcome on my threads on one condition, in between your insults,diversions and banter then at least have one answer or query directly associated to the op and after that if you feel the need to use me as your emotional punchbag as maybe things aren't quite so rosy in your life then do so on another thread and leave my threads clear please :)"
who the hell do you think you are, laying down conditions to post etc etc.
another one on here whos full of his own self percieved importance...pffft
who the hell do you think you are, laying down conditions to post etc etc.
another one on here whos full of his own self percieved importance...pffft
//A military Jihad has to obey very strict rules in order to be legitimate.
•The opponent must always have started the fighting. //
Jihadists invariably claim that the conflict was started by the other side because they are "enemies of Islam" simply by not adopting it.
//•It must not be fought to gain territory. //
The territory is considered a byproduct of bringing Islam to the people.
//•It must be launched by a religious leader. //
Whoo hoo.
//•It must be fought to bring about good - something that Allah will approve of. //
Bringing Islam to new people.
//•Every other way of solving the problem must be tried before resorting to war.//
They demand we don't insult their faith and when we refuse they claim they have tried alternatives.
//•Innocent people should not be killed. //
They consider none of the unbelievers to be innocent.
//•Women, children, or old people should not be killed or hurt. //
Oh yeah?
//•Women must not be raped. //
Women are never raped. They become short term wives and are subsequently divorced.
//•Enemies must be treated with justice. //
The justice of Allah. If they convert then OK. If not then the only justice is death.
•The opponent must always have started the fighting. //
Jihadists invariably claim that the conflict was started by the other side because they are "enemies of Islam" simply by not adopting it.
//•It must not be fought to gain territory. //
The territory is considered a byproduct of bringing Islam to the people.
//•It must be launched by a religious leader. //
Whoo hoo.
//•It must be fought to bring about good - something that Allah will approve of. //
Bringing Islam to new people.
//•Every other way of solving the problem must be tried before resorting to war.//
They demand we don't insult their faith and when we refuse they claim they have tried alternatives.
//•Innocent people should not be killed. //
They consider none of the unbelievers to be innocent.
//•Women, children, or old people should not be killed or hurt. //
Oh yeah?
//•Women must not be raped. //
Women are never raped. They become short term wives and are subsequently divorced.
//•Enemies must be treated with justice. //
The justice of Allah. If they convert then OK. If not then the only justice is death.
/
but not easy to read, broseph - have you not heard of paragraphs?/
http://
but not easy to read, broseph - have you not heard of paragraphs?/
http://
Broseph in all honesty your post is not really going to achieve much in the way of friendship and peace. The minority with the tar brushes are hardly going to respond positively while everyone else is going to feel peeved at being misjudged.
It's a shame a positive image has to be accompanied as so often with an aggressive byline
It's a shame a positive image has to be accompanied as so often with an aggressive byline
///I know sometimes it may seem hard to join in strong debates which may be above your means of comprehension but if you need help answering or understanding then please just say so so that we as a collective can help you///
Are you really referring to your own threads there? 'cause I just don't recognise the description as applicable to anything you've written!
Latest Posts
Which Outfit For The Gig Tonight?
Shopping & Style119 mins ago
My Dearest Friend Ducksie - R I P
ChatterBank121 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles122 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.