Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > Isn't This Incest?

Answers

41 to 52 of 52rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image anotheoldgit
Question Author
sp1814

/// Also AOG - the link in your question is wrong. It should be: ///

It was not wrong when I posted it, but as you must know, Newspapers up-date their Web-Sites from time to time.
12:27 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image anotheoldgit
Question Author
hc4361

/// He has adopted the child so he IS the legal father ///

Makes one wonder how it was so easy for a single gay male to adopt a child?
12:31 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image hc4361
It was only allowed because legally he is the child's brother.
12:33 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image Barmaid
Isn't this incest?

No, because incest is sexual activity between two people who are related in certain degrees. No sexual activity took place.
12:35 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image anotheoldgit
Question Author
hc4361

/// It was only allowed because legally he is the child's brother. ///

CONFUSED???????? Well I am now, but that does not matter, but it does for the child, he has to work this one out for the rest of his life.
12:38 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image DTCwordfan
It would have helped to have been targeted in on the actual item rather than the morass of the swamp called the Mail. The article on Hampton Court is interesting though - this item is a bore and no is the answer.
12:42 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image jno
lol SeaJayPea, I am getting incestuous Top Gear stories too.
12:46 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image rockyracoon
If necessary and if I was able, I'd do it for either of my kids in a heartbeat.
12:53 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image THECORBYLOON
ANOTHEOLDGIT if you knew that the woman who gave birth was also the mother of the sperm donor, why are you confused about the wee one and the donor being brothers? Are you being t.i.c. again?


13:03 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image Old_Geezer
Had his mother supplied the egg then I would have said it was incest. The whole point of declaring incest as wrong is to avoid the combination of genes from folk who are close on their family tree, and the potential health issues that are risked by that. Regardless of how it was accomplished, that would have been what occurred. (It would be looking for loopholes to claim it is not because physical intercourse did not occur. The raison d'etre for the labelling this as wrong, has been ignored.) However as the mother only offered her womb as incubator then it is outside of any reasonable definition of incest.
13:03 Sat 07th Mar 2015
Avatar Image bednobs
About as confusing as it is for anyone not brought up by bothI of their biological patents eg remarried couples,war widows, grandparent s
Ie not confusing at all
13:03 Sat 07th Mar 2015
-- answer removed --

41 to 52 of 52rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3

Do you know the answer?

Isn't This Incest?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.