Donate SIGN UP

Guns and burglars ...

Avatar Image
andy-hughes | 16:57 Fri 28th Sep 2012 | ChatterBank
102 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/...ld-us-canada-19756499

Here is a salutory lesson for the Self-Rigteous Brothers who think it's perfectly OK for hot-headed gun-owning householders to take potshots at intruders.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 102rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by andy-hughes. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
man gets call from sister, goes to assist, person in black gets shot, whats your point?
andy I'm not self-righteous but if I found someone breaking into my house, especially if I had family, and I had a legally held shotgun, I'd shoot the buggers.
Question Author
baza - the point is that the guy has to live with shooting his son for the rest of his life.

It beggars belief that in a civilised society in 2012, there are people who really do think it's Ok to gun down another human being in defence of their property.

I appreeciate that this case is slightly different - the father felt his life was at risk, but what's wrong with a shot into the air to prove that the gun is loaded, and you are prepared to use it?

If people hold guns, people get killed, and I find it hard to reconcile some frontersman 'a man's home is his castle' rhetoric to balance that fact.
andy no-one makes a burglar break into someone's property. It's up to the burglar to weigh up the risks and decide if it's worth the possibility that he may be shot (especially in the countryside). I used to live in a small village and the first Mr Craft had a licensed shotgun. It really is a Clint Eastwood situation in "So tell me punk, do you feel lucky?"
Trouble is you do not know what weapons the burglars are carrying - and there are a lot of criminals with guns and knives - agree with craft.
andy we have been burgled twice, and I can tell you that if I had caught them in the act and I had a gun I would have shot them no questions asked.
And sometimes they do more than just burgle. Shouldn't be in somebody else's house in the first place.
When I was single I returned home one night to find my house had been burgled. At first I was terrified that they were still in the house, and then I just stood there and shook. I loved my house but the burglars just ruined it for me. For months afterwards I checked every window and door when leaving the house, and the same when I came home. I even got to the stage of checking in wardrobes and under the beds because I was so scared someone could be hiding..........in the end I had to sell the house as I just didn't feel safe..............burglars are scum.
Had to sell our house as well crafty, it totally freaked my Mrs out.
Is it me or is there a big gap in that story?
Question Author
I am not for one minute trying to argue for a burglars' charter here, but I honestly find the notion that a burlgar 'takes his chances' when breaking into a house when the houseowner may be armed to be a chilling concept.

For the record, I have been burgled, and I do understand the feelings of invasion and violation that follow, but the idea that if I had a gun and been there i would have shot someone is frankly appalling.

Yes, he (or she!) may have been lifting my tv, but that would be no comfort to me if i took someone's life, and the idea that some kind of self-justification can be proffered because they 'deserved it' cuts no ice with me at all.

craft - you talk about a 'Clint Eastwood' situation - but remember Harry's other speech? Nolt the 'Do you feel lucky ...punk?' or the 'Make my day ...' lines, but the concept of people gunning each other down in the way that some people think is acceptable as 'defence of property'.

As Clint says "Next thing you know, you are executing your neighbour because his dog pisses on your lawn ..." so maybe it is not quite as simple as such opinion hoilders are trying to infer.
andy, different folks, different strokes.
Surely andy the simple way to stop unnecessary shootings is.........don't burgle.
Question Author
Sure craft, and the equally simple, and equally impossible notion for stoping unecessary shootings is - don't let anyone outside the armed forces and the police hold a gun!
andy..now I get what your point is, I have not so far been robbed nor do I own a gun, I do agree that to go out gun blazing is way over the top and to shoot your own son as a result must be terrible.
So someone breaks into my house, and threatens my family with a knife, or a hammer, or a baseball bat, is that okay?
No it's not crafty, so you do what ever it takes, well I would anyway.
andy..you had me on side until your last bit , friendly fire with armed forces, coppers shooting man leaving pub with a table leg, a gun does not kill, people with a gun kill.
Question Author
baza - thank you.

As I have said, I do not for one moment condone the invasion of anyone's property - or person, but the notion that you can shoot someone for it becomes the thin end of a very nasty wedge.

There's a guy who walks his dog past my house most nights, and his dog wees on the wheelarch of my car parked outside - does it justify a bullet behind the ear for either - or indeed both?

I know that's an extreme example, but there are people there, who, given that level of largesse, would indulge it, and hey presto, a vigilante survival-of-the-fitest mindset rumbles into view.

We have to be very careful of this train of thought - because of where it could lead, and where we as a society could finish up.
We'll obviously have to agree to differ Andy. I personally think that home-owners shoot burglars out of fear more than anything else.

1 to 20 of 102rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Guns and burglars ...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.