Ok so what did I get off the beak?

[d9f1c7]

OK Some of you may remember my admission if a dark and macabre crime:
http://www.theanswerb.../Question1110327.html
Where I rival the great despots of history for pure evil. Anyway I was up before those lovely people on my local bench this week. Reffering of course to predictions and perhaps even opinions of what should be the penalty for the most heinous of crimes, who would like to guess what actual punishment their worships dolled out? I would offer a prize for the first correct answer but there appears to be no mechanism for it here so I will offer my sincere congratulations to the winner. A clue, costs where £50.

[Mick-Talbot]

A fair bit of irony in your post then , Mr Substrata.

[THECORBYLOON]

If you think the limit should be 80mph, why were you doing 89mph? What about folk who think they are better drivers than you, what if they thought they were safe at 120mph? What makes you think you are such a safe driver anyway?

[ummmm]

Because he's never had a crash TCL...

Nor have I, btw..

[THECORBYLOON]

Too bad if he's on a single carriageway and meets another "safe" driver overtaking in the opposite direction and they're both doing about 80...

[d9f1c7]

you cannot really have a sensible debate with the black and white motoring evangelistas.

[jno]

especially if they disagree with you

[gness]

Searched you posts but couldn`t find anything sensible to debate. Sorry.

[THECORBYLOON]

The black and white being the speed limit was 50 you were doing 89, you think a speed limit of 70 is too low and it should be 80 but went more than 10% over that one...

[TWR]

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

[ummmm]

You tired TWR?? :-)

[TWR]

Hiya, that was a long episode. how are you? are you sunbathing this morning?

[flip_flop]

I have just stumbled across this thread, and have seen the following from Canary42, which has got to be just about the most ridiculous post I've ever seen on this site.

"Paedophiles - injure/maim/kill innocent children as a result of lust for unnatural sex.

Speedophiles - injure/maim/kill far greater numbers of innocent children as a result of lust for unnatural speed.

They deserve equal vilification."

By "equal vilification" Canary42 is seriously suggesting that speeding is just as bad as having sex with a child!!!

Jesus Christ on a bike.

[ummmm]

I agree Flip. Not a good comparison!!