My God! My detective instincts were right! While I was compiling what I post below, those of us who were on the side of the angels were completely vindicated. Good for you, Jonah! But what a disgraceful business! And it just got more and more disgraceful.
I will post the below anyway. It is more relevant than ever.
Alun, you say
"You began your post by basically agreeing with me that there's more than one side to a story, yes? But you then end it by being judgemental about the teaching staff, you can't have it both ways, you're either objective - or not."
I agreed with you from start to finish that there's more than one side to a story. That is why I asked Jonah to be specific about the evidence that this woman called the boy a freak. And that is ALSO why I worry whether it will be "properly investigated". I have not received the reassurance I hoped for on either of those points.
So both ways is precisely the way I have to have it.
But at no point am I judgmental about the teaching staff. I am quite explicitly suspending judgment. Knowing that "there's more than one side to a story, and that the powers that be at the school will be have to be consultative towards all interested parties", I adduce prima facie evidence of reason to be suspicious about the fairness and democracy of the process in this case. If you like, it is also evidence that I personally think the balance in favour of the child, which in this case one has to hope for, has been compromised by the head's support for the teacher's demand for an apology for "walking out on her"
The two sides to a story are often of very unequal merit, and quite often rightly given very unequal weight. These days it seems to me that administrative staff are in mortal terror of children and their parents, and may therefore give too much weight to unsubstantiated accusations of far more s