Donate SIGN UP

What court would a person end up in...

Avatar Image
snine | 18:12 Fri 28th Mar 2008 | Law
6 Answers
What court would a person end up in if they had been charged for carrying a knife but had done no harm with it. Would this be a serious offence? Would they go to the magistrates court?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by snine. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Having a bladed article in a public place is an 'either way' offence. The matter would first be considered by a magistrates court. In most cases it would be dealt with there. It would only be referred up to the Crown court if:
(a) the defendant pleaded not guilty and elected to be tried by a jury ; or
(b) the magistrates court believed that there were difficult legal issues involved, which required the attention of a judge ; or
(c) the magistrates believed that their sentencing powers were likely to be insufficient to deal with the matter.

The maximum penalty before a magistrates court is 6 months imprisonment. The maximum penalty before a Crown court is 4 years imprisonment.

In practice, first-time offenders might simply receive a police caution. Those who appear before the courts would almost certainly appear solely before a magistrates court and be fined and/or given a community punishment. (e.g. 150 hours unpaid work).

Chris
Question Author
thanks for answering my question in such a detailed manner. Would you care to give a few more details ie a more understandable answer for b) because i didnt understand that. I like my answers spot on if you get what i mean.
Condition (b) hardly ever applies. However, I'll try to think of an example which might apply for this type of offence:

The defendant might plead not guilty on the grounds that he wasn't in a public place. The prosecution might argue that they were sure his location met the definition of a public place. At this point, the magistrates would probably seek advice from the clerk of the court regarding the relevant legal definition. If the clerk could only find test cases where the situation was similar but not identical, the magistrates might decide that it required a judge to determine the validity of the law for the particular circumstances referred to in the charge before them. In which case, they'd rule that the matter was beyond their powers and refer the case to the Crown court. (Note that the 'powers', referred to there, relate to the magistrates powers to make decisions about the law. That's completely separate from the situation where they refer a case to the Crown court because of insufficient sentencing powers).

As I've indicated, such a referral to the Crown court would be extremely rare. (Normally, magistrates either know the finer points of the law or they can get the relevant information from their clerk).

Chris
damn he's good...
too true he is.

Thanks for your post re Julie Chris.

Katie. x
Question Author
any more answers would be welcome. i want as much information as possible.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

What court would a person end up in...

Answer Question >>