Donate SIGN UP

fao Doc

Avatar Image
Sqad | 09:42 Tue 19th Oct 2010 | Body & Soul
36 Answers
Doc, I am still "drooling" over the photographs that you allowed us to share of your wedding with Puss and those extremely interesting newspaper clips.

I am just wondering and please forgive me if I am being greedy and unreasonable, but I dont suppose that you have any photographs of Puss´s uncle´s mother´s children, that you could share with us this morning.

It would be appreciated.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 36rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Sqad. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Is this meant to be in B&S Sqad???
-- answer removed --
Well technically it is BS ummmm so I can't see why not ;0)
Question Author
Oooops sorry ummmm.

It´s a cr@p topic anyway, so I will leave it here.
Question Author
doc...LOL
You are a sarky bugger. lol
No reason CD except I think this did not go according to plan :-)
Shame... He'll need to say something controversial, perhaps about mistresses or 'no big deal' or something else from his party bag of wind ups...
Question Author
CD....How dare you?
How dare I what? Accuse you of being a wind up merchant.... You're absolutely right, I don't know what came over me. Utterly unthinkable of course.
I would love to see them doc - so take no notice of this miserable bugger....
-- answer removed --
I'd love to see some more pics as well, doc.

Even when Sqad's joking, he still sounds like a miserable bu88er.
It's a cover mrs c for his true sensitive, caring, selfless nature.
Question Author
mrs c./salla...let me make this quire clear to you and all contributors.

I am of the generation, god or bad, that things like birthdays, births, deaths, marital problems ect were not broadcast throughout the world......I am not discussing whether that be a good thing or bad.

The thought of seeing or indeed commenting on the wedding photographs and newspaper shots of people that I do not know or indeed care less about and unlikely ever to meet, is a complete anathema to me.

I have already asked if the couple involved were ugly or deformed in any way, whether the pictures would have been produced and I have been reassured that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"......I just wonder.

To me this is sheer exhibitionism which does not suit me, but may suit others.

In my opinion, this does not make me a "miserable bu88er"
that is your opinion, which you are entitled to, but your argument falls apart when you contribute to the thread, if you dont like or not interested in the subject > why get involved with it ?
Question Author
anne....I am not making an "argument"....just stating an opinion.

Threads would be nonsensical and boring if antagonists do not get involved.

What you are saying is "if you dont agree, then "shut up"

OK
he posted it to "make his point"

sadly it will fall on deaf ears because doc is a genuine what you see is what you get kind of person, he does not need to paint a picture of splendour with various fairy tales which to my mind are much worse than showing his pictures.

at least they are 100% real
Question Author
cazz.....I do agree.

I was just defending my accusations against being called a "miserable bu88er" because I had an opposite opinion.

1 to 20 of 36rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

fao Doc

Answer Question >>