Unjustified Name Calling.

[sevenOP]

Does unjustifiably calling another User "a pro-Kremlin troll" breach the Site Rules?

[ABSpareEditor]

Yes. You can report the question or answer to us using the report facility. Please do not use an apostrophe in the report, as doing so can cause an error.

[Peter Pedant]

you dont mean Boris do you?
o wait a minute Boris doesnt post here - - - - ( does he)

sozza memo to self - AB is a serious site....

[1ozzy]

//Please do not use an apostrophe in the report, as doing so can cause an error.//

No properly Englush, while you're at it, forget your grammar lessons, LOL!!

And please donate, the new owners need to buy a few drinks come Friday night ;-/

[sevenOP]

Thank you for clarifying that, SpareEditor.

[ichkeria]

It’s true though

[ichkeria]

It isn’t “name calling” by the way.

It’s assessing someone’s opinions and drawing sane conclusions whether they be correct or not

[ichkeria]

And you’ve spiked your own complaint by using the word “unjustified”

[sevenOP]

ichkeria : "It’s true though....It isn’t “name calling” by the way."

ichkeria, substantiate your claim .

[THECORBYLOON]

The ED has given her response so why not leave it at that, eh?

[FatticusInch]

As I pointed out in the Secret Mod thread, some users of the site are given preferential treatment over others.

One describes anyone with even a slightly alternate political view to his as a 5th Columnist, Poltroon or a Marxist and does so with impunity.
It’s selective Moderation, it’s allowed to increase site traffic and thus gain revenue. Get used to it.

[sevenOP]

THECORBYLOON,
ichkeria has made these 'troll' allegations of me before, so I would like ichkeria to justify them.( which ichkeria could not do on previously)

[naomi24]

Fatticusinch, 'Borstriches'?

[barry1010]

Can name calling ever be justified?

[FatticusInch]

naomi24
//Fatticusinch, 'Borstriches'?//

That’s for those who don’t acknowledge factual, documentary evidence about the antics and foibles of one Boris Johnson, a very different matter.
Disagreeing with what has actually occurred and is recorded fact is your stance.

[anneasquith]

As an aside, in the past abers we’re instructed to refer to politicians etc by their proper name eg Jimmy krankie for Nicola sturgeon. The insults continue despite ‘ reporting ‘ ?

[10ClarionSt]

Fatticusinch @ 09.33:

//One describes anyone with even a slightly alternate political view to his as a 5th Columnist, Poltroon or a Marxist and does so with impunity.//

We all know who that user is. I prefer to call him Harry Boyle, the character from Wait Till Your Father Gets Home, who thought everyone was communist.

[naomi24]

No, Fatticusinch, it's aimed at people who don't share your opinion and is actually very childish.

[Peter Pedant]

not spiked ( like remifentanyl) the noun ( or er name) (*)
but surely qualified
and who will judge the qualification and whether it is just or not
( 440 useless posts in which we are all guilty , reader, later...)

Hadacard had a go at Nailit ( in front of me, you have to be quick at this) calling him, bald alcoholic. Nailit protested that he had a good head of hair for an alco....

and I thought it was better left....away it went.

Mrs Cheese - anti vaxxer was also active. She of course will protest she isnt an antivaxxer, ( all her frenz who have been vaccinated are now dead, some dead in battle some poisoned by their wives, others deposed (*) all murthered) isnt an antivaxxer but it telling the troof ( no not as she sees it, the unvarnished troof)

(*) as the secret mod boasted yesterday, she doesnt read Tostoy, she doesnt read Churchill, but yes today it is
Shakey - on AB ! (eek) for within this hollow crown which bounds the temples of the mortal kings keeps death his court.... Richard II you are quite right

oh dear dear where will all end?

- hey this is a quote from 400 y ago - who was it who was whining about hundred year old precedents in the law section yesterday? ( and I wasnt even trying)

[Peter Pedant]

yeah agree Anne - had to wade thro wee jimmy again yesterday and lord bush-whacker or botty - boo or some other gormless name

as if the points are clearer when he does so

[FatticusInch]

naomi24
//No, Fatticusinch, it's aimed at people who don't share your opinion and is actually very childish.//

Get it right naomi24, you never acknowledge any recorded factual evidence about the misdemeanours of the former PM, hence you scuttle off whenever it’s presented to you.
As pointed out here.

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1811301-2.html