Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"Alleged terrorist", and also "human". The ECHR favours humans. Difficult as it might be for you to believe, terrorists are humans too.
So he was detained at the request of the Americans and we have been paying for his incarceration and court proceedings ever since.

If he has done anything, put him on trial. If he is convicted, the American authorities can interview him. Otherwise he is innocent and we should let him go.

The British case against him is that he phone the 7/7 bombers an hour before their attack. GCHQ will have records, so why has he never been prosecuted in this country.

I'm afraid Muslim terrorists dont share you libertarian views. They regard you as sub-human and ripe for slaughter.
We hold someone for 8 years without trial and then whinge when we lose court case after court case and the cost.

Just put him before a jury. Let us the British public decide if he is guilty, not the intelligence agency of a foreign country.
youngmafbog

He is not a muslim terrorist.
"I'm afraid Muslim terrorists dont share you libertarian views. They regard you as sub-human and ripe for slaughter."

More fool them, but I still think it's worth holding onto such views.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Echr Favouring Terrorists Again!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.