People are objecting primarily to the style of the presentation, it seems to me, which is understandable I suppose - Not sure how much attention I would pay to someone shouting through a megaphone at Speakers Corner, or whatever :)
I think the fundamental point he is making is perfectly true and difficult for theists to answer though- all theists, not just christian, although he is using biblical references - since contained with both the OT and NT are several mysogynistic and patriarchal verses which clearly state that, biblically speaking, women should consider themselves subjects and chattels of men. Indeed, several of these verses attribute the fall of man the introduction of sin and mankinds mortality entirely to women.
So for a woman to embrace Christianity (and the other abrahamic religions, come to that), she has presumably either to agree with those sentiments, which is just sad, or she has to ignore those verses - which is blatant cherry-picking, a frequent assessment and complaint of those of us who are not religious who resent religions taking on the mantle of " the religion of peace and love". assuming the right to object to progressive cultural developments such as equality for all, and presuming the primary authority and right to lecture the rest of us on moral and cultural values