Donate SIGN UP

Why weren't charges made against these pieces of scum?

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 10:59 Sat 09th Jun 2012 | News
26 Answers
http://www.dailymail....d-boy-owner-toss.html

It was said that no charges were made because it was on private property???????????????

Surely they could have been charged for keeping a dangerous animal?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 26 of 26rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I have all sympathy for the child I would be devastated if any of mine but the argument here is that the owners should have been charged. I can't see a 2 year old child opening a gate.
anad to add to that the gate should have been locked .
hope the family sues the owner's butt then!

cath x
It's these types of owners that scare me. I reckon that almost ANY dog in their care would be dangerous, as that's the reason these morons want them, not for a loving family pet.
A poor child has been injured, a dog has been put down, now I know who I blame.
So how did the child get out of his own garden?

Of course a 2 year old can open a gate.
A 2 year old should not be able to open a tall back gate (as this was) if it had been properly secured. Our back gate is the same design and my 4 year old grandson can't open it.

21 to 26 of 26rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Why weren't charges made against these pieces of scum?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.