Donate SIGN UP

About bankruptcy please ...

Avatar Image
Vivkins3 | 19:14 Fri 01st May 2009 | Law
8 Answers
About 14 years ago I got a County Court Judgment (personally) against somebody who owed me around �800.00.

As part of the enforcement proceedings I obtained a charge against his house but he upped and left (did a runner) without leaving a forwarding address.

I never forgot him and googled his name a while ago and was fortunate enough to discover his present address.

I've got it in mind to re-commence enforcement proceedings. By a fluke, I was selling at an antiques Fair last weekend and he was walking round buying things with his (presumably) wife and a couple of children about 8-10 years old. I recognised him but don't think he recognised us as he stood at our stall for a while and there was no trace of recognition in his face. Like I said, he seemed to have money but when I googled him that evening, he'd been declared bankrupt just last month.

I suspect he's been bankrupted before (he's one of those guys who make a living by not paying bills). My question is this: As a creditor of his, should I have been notified of his bankruptcy? As I wasn't, am I entitled to ignore the banckruptcy when I do eventually feel the time is right to re-commence enforcement?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Vivkins3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I don't understand how he sold the house without you knowing. The charge should have been paid before he got any proceeds from the house, unless there wasn't enough to pay the mortgage.

It is pointless pursuing a bankrupt - you will be throwing good money after bad.
Question Author
He didn't "sell" the house - just did a runner.

I'm willing to wait - he will be discharged next year. I wasn't notified (and only found out by accident) that he was bankrupt. I thought that in order for a backruptcy to be valid and to apply to a particular debt, he had to notify ALL his creditors.
You mean he still owns the house and your charge is still valid?

If he's been made bankrupt how has that happened, especially if he didn't live there?
Question Author
No he didnt sell the house - he just did a runner and I imagine the Building Society repossessed it.

I know where he is living now - I don;t know if he owns or rents that house though.
Yes you have a point vivkins3 but cant you see how he is still negatively affecting your life?
Question Author
Not particularly - I don't dwell on it but I would prefer to see that �800+ in MY bank account than him spending it. Why the hell should he get away with it? It could buy me a holiday.

It's MY money - why shouldn't I have it?
1. You seem unsure what happened to the house. You ought to find out, but it is likely that if it was repossessed the sale price was insufficient for your charge to be paid off (i.e. the mortgage lender would have taken all the proceeds). However, you should have been notified at the time.

2. If he owns his present house and is bankrupt then he is at risk of losing it. If there are any proceeds (other than those to pay off the mortgage) then they would be shared between the creditors after the OR has covered his costs.

3. I assume you have found his entry on the online Insolvency Register. If so, you will know which Court he was bankrupted at & can find out which OR's office is dealing with him. As it was only last month, it could be that he put your debt down on the form but that the OR has not yet got round to contacting you. However, even if he did not put you down on the form your debt is included in his bankruptcy and you cannot chase it in any other way. Contact the OR & give details of the debt. But I suspect you are most unlikely to get any money.
Question Author
I don't truly have a great deal of faith in the Official Receiver's Office.

My last dealings with (another) debtor who went bankrupt was that the debtor threatened to trash the house if it was repossessed so the Receiver allowed him to keep it. To my mind the debtor should have been arrested for threatening behaviour and (if he had carried out the threat) criminal damage.

I feel the bankruptcy laws are loaded in favour of the debtor - and don't get me started on the more recent IVAs. Talk about a Crook's Charter. They actively encourage people to spend beyond their means safe in the knowledge that they won't ever be made to pay their debt in full. Let alone interest.

I would seriously have more faith in a guy with a baseball bat than the court system.




1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Do you know the answer?

About bankruptcy please ...

Answer Question >>