Foxy Knoxy is innocent

[joggerjayne]

A prosecution witness has testified that she heard a scream. She wasn't sure of the date, and she didn't see, or hear, Amanda Knox.

The autopsy report read to the jury confirms that the knife in question belonged to Rafaelle Sollecito, some dodgy bloke whom Amanda had met 10 days earlier. It was not part of the cutlery from Amanda's flat.

But ... a local grocer, Marco Quintavalle, thinks (!) Amanda went to his shop on November 2nd to buy cleaning products.

So ...

Never mind witnesses to the crime ...

Never mind forensic evidence ...

Never mind DNA ...

If you buy bleach, you're a murderer.

Oh, purleeeeez !!



Jayne's campaign continues !

[NoMercy]

But what I cannot understand is why they are pursuing the case against Knox if they already have a conviction. Surely they don't need to pin the murder on her, when they have already convicted Rudy Herman Guede, after he confessed to the murder. RHG also claims Knox and Sollecito were involved, as far as I am aware.

[Schutzengel]

The case against Knox and Sollecito is being pursued, because if all three persons were involved in the murder, no matter who struck the final blow, they are all equally guilty. Which is why 'they' are still looking for firm evidence, besides which the forensic evidence has not yet been heard.

[joggerjayne]

How was she "involved" though ?

Sure ... RHG says she was ... well, he would.

Did she plot the murder (conspire)? No.

Did she provide the weapon? No.

Did she strike the fatal blow? No.

So, erm ... how was she "involved"

[joggerjayne]

The thing is ... when you're trying to put someone away for life, it's not good enough to say

"We think she was involved somehow"

You have to say what she did, and ...

... prove it !!!

Bear in mind, the Italian Prosecutors have not even specified what they think that she did.

It is a complete fishing expedition by the Prosecutors.

It is an appalling abuse of the legal system.

They are sticking Amanda Knox on trial, and kind of hoping that something will come out in the wash.

Well ... it won't.

[NOX]

I'm very upset by this thread, I thought someone thought I was foxy :(

Personally I dunno if she did it or not, since I'm not in court to hear all of the subtle nuances of the evidence, so I'll remain on the fence about it, but I do hope that if there isn't more than circumstancial evidence against her that the jury don't convict her anyway just because she's obviously not a very nice person, which actually is a distict possibility.

[joggerjayne]

She may well be a horrid person ...

But, sadly, that is about the extent of the Prosecution evidence ... they don't like her !

[Leggendisgod]

How was she "involved" though ?

Sure ... RHG says she was ... well, he would.

Did she plot the murder (conspire)? No.

Did she provide the weapon? No.

Did she strike the fatal blow? No.

So, erm ... how was she "involved"



if you know for definitew to the contrary


you should be in the court






i reckon shes guilty

and will pay the price

[Leggendisgod]

small point here jayne

fatal blow?

wasnt her throat slit??



mmmmmm


circumstancial im huessing eh ?�? : 0)

[joggerjayne]

I don't "know for definite to the contrary"

But nobody has to prove for definite that they are innocent !

The prosecution have to prove that you are guilty.

A person is innocent until PROVEN guilty.

If nothing can be proved for definite ...

... then she is Not Guilty.

[flobadob]

If she was ugly she would be immediately guilty as sin. Because she's good looking she must be innocent. Case closed.

[joggerjayne]

Yes, her throat was slit (which is ghastly).

It was slit by Rudy Guede ...

... who is now serving a life sentence for murder.

[Leggendisgod]

so waht killer blow are you talking about?

you have veeered totally off at a tangent in an attempt to prove your point.


may as well say shes innocent because she didnt shot the deceased





and again
shes as plain as a plain jane could be


granted shes a bit of a dirty slapper by alll accounts

but no

shes not foxy

shes just poxy

[joggerjayne]

flobadob ... well, yes, precisely.

=0)

(actually, that's a more rational argument than anything put forward so far by the Italian prosecutors).

[Leggendisgod]

shes guilty

watch n see

[joggerjayne]

Leggy ...

Would you be happier if I called it a "killer slash" instead of a "killer blow" ???

Okay ... Amanda Knox didn't do the killer slash ... Rudy Guede did.

[Leggendisgod]

how many slashes were there ?


did she do an earlier one?


welll ??



rumpole of the bailey stun us

[joggerjayne]

I'd be surprised if Amanda Knox even has to give evidence.

I think, at the end of the prosecution's (so called) "evidence" the Judge could find that there is no case to answer, and direct the jury to return a verdict of Not Guilty.

[Leggendisgod]

hope not


id execute the b�tch fro being so disrespectful to the poor dead flatmate.


shes filth , scum , i hope they lock her away fro 20 years

if she gets off its a travesty,



btw jayne imn away noe before i get as boring as youve become on the subject


and a gain shes not foxy shes a plain pervy wee skank.

??�? d t h ?�?�??




enjoy the obsession : 0)

[joggerjayne]

Leggy ...

It matters not one jot how many slashes there were.

Neither the Police, nor the Prosecutors, have ever alleged that Knox did the slashing. Rudy Guede did that.

The point is ... they have never alleged much at all.