Donate SIGN UP

Latest AB vote - leaving your child unattended

Avatar Image
Avatar | 14:09 Mon 21st May 2007 | News
1 Answers
A pointless exercise this latest vote I think as it does not give any age ranges. I think all 4 could quite correctly apply depending on the age of the child in question. I would certainly be happy to leave my 16 year old for half an hour playing on his PS3 whilst I wander next door. Am I evil incarnate?
Gravatar

Answers

Only 1 answerrss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Avatar. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I think from a legal point of view, a child in this case is classed as under 14 years old. So you are quite correct that the question is badly worded. I would not have left my 1 year old for any thing longer than a few minutes and only then if necessary. However, do you need to similary watch over 12 and 13 year olds?

Only 1 answerrss feed

Do you know the answer?

Latest AB vote - leaving your child unattended

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.