Donate SIGN UP

Clinton, Barack, Richardson or Giuliani...place your bets!

Avatar Image
whowhatwhy | 15:28 Tue 23rd Jan 2007 | Politics
6 Answers
Here's an early book on the 2008 US elections:
Okay here's what I reckon:

Barack will get the majority of the countries vote in the early poles...'Evil' Clinton will attempt to bully and buy her way to power, with success, until a smear campaign digs up some real dirt on her from her past....Richardson will drop away and side with Barack . Barack gets the democratic vote. Giuliani will get the republic vote (there's no one else!) most of the East coast vote Giuliani. In the long run though Barack wins by slim majority.

I know that i'm underestimating Clinton Mk2 here, but even though i'm a democrat, i feel that there is just something obviously 'not right' about her....besides I think that America is still more sexist than racist!

What does anyone else think?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by whowhatwhy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'd like to see Barack Obama get in just to annoy the bigots. But I don't think it'll happen. Hilary has more of a chance but I don't think she'll make it either, not with her baggage.

Check this link out, American politics is dirty and Fox News is cr@p:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/horsesmouth/2 007/01/post_15.php
Question Author
Hey great article, thanks for the link. I too would love to see Obama as president. I had completely forgotten about the influence of the Murdoch family and their shoddy attempts at 'news coverage'. Clinton does have a lot of baggage so, if she doesn't make it, Obama doesn't make it.....who could it be? Surely Ex-Major Giuliani's influence can't spread much further from the east coast?
It's funny, I was convinced that the next President of the US would be a topic that everyone would have an opinion on.

Looking at the lack of responses to your question I guess I was wrong.
Surely John McCain is the clear favourite? Why doesn't he get a mention?

Barack and Clinton might be getting the column inches at the moment but the US is still too right-wing for any Deomocrat to be regarded as favourite.

I'm sure McCain is ahead of Guilianni in the Republican polls so he's the one to beat.

Let's pray that America sees sense and votes blue though.
Question Author
I must admit I too thought that more people would have a thought to share over this...after all it will define the UK's role in the world over the next 5-10 years. I must admit I don't know much about John McCain, I have been living in New York for the past 3 months and he didn't really get much of a mention. I do a little research!
I think many are just tired of "All Politics - All the Time" news cycle. Especially when most of the "Next Election" coverage reads liks a gossip column this early in the season. Note the dust-up between Hillary and Barack. Note the talk about Barack's white mother. There are no real issues here. The journalists who cover this kind of gossip do not need to know anything about anything to report on those "tantalizing" tidbits.

It's boring for the most part.

And besides -- to whowhatwhy -- New Yorkers like to talk about New Yorkers. Therefore in New York you will hear Hillary and Rudy.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Clinton, Barack, Richardson or Giuliani...place your bets!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.